Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Experimental Therapies for Hoarding Disorder: A Review of the Literature

Q4 Medicine
N. Hidayati, Nazla Nida, Iwan Shalahuddin
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Experimental Therapies for Hoarding Disorder: A Review of the Literature","authors":"N. Hidayati, Nazla Nida, Iwan Shalahuddin","doi":"10.35516/jmj.v57i2.1359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study identified therapies for hoarding disorder. \nMethods: The literature review method was employed with several databases: EBSCOhost, PubMed, Sage Journals, and ScienceDirect, and the Google Scholar search engine. Articles were sorted based on the following inclusion criteria: published between 2011–2021, written in Indonesian or English, available full-text, type of experimental study (RCT, quasi), focus on hoarding or compulsive hoarding and its effects on daily life, and including a sample for a primary study with adult and elderly hoarders aged 19 plus. \nResults: Five articles were found discussing therapies using an experimental method of treating hoarding disorder. The findings showed improvement in hoarding symptoms with outcomes of 23–28% for support group therapy, 31.8% for contingency management therapy, 38% for cognitive rehabilitation and exposure/sorting therapy (CREST), 43% for community-based CREST, and four out of six (66.67%) participants experiencing clinically significant changes following clutter buddies therapy. \nConclusion: The procedures, periods, and number of sessions allotted to each study could have influenced the effectiveness of the intervention. However, since only one study used an RCT, further research is recommended using this method regarding therapies for hoarding disorder.","PeriodicalId":39681,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v57i2.1359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study identified therapies for hoarding disorder. Methods: The literature review method was employed with several databases: EBSCOhost, PubMed, Sage Journals, and ScienceDirect, and the Google Scholar search engine. Articles were sorted based on the following inclusion criteria: published between 2011–2021, written in Indonesian or English, available full-text, type of experimental study (RCT, quasi), focus on hoarding or compulsive hoarding and its effects on daily life, and including a sample for a primary study with adult and elderly hoarders aged 19 plus. Results: Five articles were found discussing therapies using an experimental method of treating hoarding disorder. The findings showed improvement in hoarding symptoms with outcomes of 23–28% for support group therapy, 31.8% for contingency management therapy, 38% for cognitive rehabilitation and exposure/sorting therapy (CREST), 43% for community-based CREST, and four out of six (66.67%) participants experiencing clinically significant changes following clutter buddies therapy. Conclusion: The procedures, periods, and number of sessions allotted to each study could have influenced the effectiveness of the intervention. However, since only one study used an RCT, further research is recommended using this method regarding therapies for hoarding disorder.
囤积障碍的随机对照试验和准实验治疗:文献综述
目的:本研究确定了治疗囤积症的方法。方法:采用文献综述法对几个数据库进行检索:EBSCOhost、PubMed、Sage Journals、ScienceDirect和Google Scholar搜索引擎。文章根据以下入选标准进行排序:2011年至2021年间发表,用印尼语或英语撰写,全文可用,实验研究类型(RCT,准),重点关注囤积或强迫性囤积及其对日常生活的影响,并包括一个针对19岁以上成年和老年囤积者的初步研究样本。结果:发现五篇文章讨论了使用实验方法治疗囤积症的疗法。研究结果显示,囤积症状有所改善,支持组治疗的结果为23-28%,应急管理治疗的结果是31.8%,认知康复和暴露/分类治疗(CREST)的结果是38%,社区CREST的结果是43%,六分之四(66.67%)的参与者在杂物伙伴治疗后经历了临床显著变化。结论:每项研究的程序、时间和疗程数量可能会影响干预的有效性。然而,由于只有一项研究使用了随机对照试验,因此建议对囤积症的治疗使用这种方法进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jordan Medical Journal
Jordan Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信