Utility of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemic-3 Items as a Tool for Assessing Work-Related Stress, and Relationship With Insomnia and Burnout of Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Q4 Medicine
Hoon Sung Son, M. Ahn, Kyumin Kim, Inn-Kyu Cho, Joohee Lee, S. Suh, Seockhoon Chung
{"title":"Utility of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemic-3 Items as a Tool for Assessing Work-Related Stress, and Relationship With Insomnia and Burnout of Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Hoon Sung Son, M. Ahn, Kyumin Kim, Inn-Kyu Cho, Joohee Lee, S. Suh, Seockhoon Chung","doi":"10.17241/smr.2021.01025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and ObjectiveaaThe aim of this study is to explore the usefulness of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemic-3 items (SAVE-3) scale as a tool for assessing work-related stress inhealthcare workers.MethodsaaThere were 389 participants and all remained anonymous. The SAVE-9, the PatientHealth Questionnaire-4, the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel(MBI-HSS-MP), the perceived stress scale (PSS), and single item insomnia measure wereused. After checking whether the SAVE-3 scale is clustered into a sole factor from SAVE-9 scalebased on principal component analysis with promax rotation, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)was done on the 3 items of the SAVE-3 to examine the factorial validity for a unidimensionalstructure.ResultsaaThe SAVE-3 was clustered with factor loadings from 0.664–0.752, and a CFA revealedthat 3 items of the SAVE-3 cohered together into a unidimensional construct with fit for all of indices(comparative fit index = 1.00;Tucker Lewis index = 1.031;standardized root-mean-square residual= 0.001;root-mean-square-error of approximation = 0.00). The SAVE-3 scale showed acceptablereliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.56 and McDonald’s ω = 0.57) in this sample. A high SAVE-3score correlated significantly with younger age (r = -0.12, p = 0.02), a high PSS score (r = 0.24, p <0.001), a high total score for the MBI-HSS-MP (r = 0.35, p < 0.001) and all of its subscales (emotionalexhaustion, r = 0.40, p < 0.001;personal accomplishment, r = -0.14, p < 0.005;depersonalization,r = 0.39, p < 0.001), and poor sleep quality (r = 0.15, p < 0.001).ConclusionsaaTaken together, the data suggest that SAVE-3 is a reliable, valid, and usable scalefor measuring work-related stress in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 epidemic","PeriodicalId":37318,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17241/smr.2021.01025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background and ObjectiveaaThe aim of this study is to explore the usefulness of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemic-3 items (SAVE-3) scale as a tool for assessing work-related stress inhealthcare workers.MethodsaaThere were 389 participants and all remained anonymous. The SAVE-9, the PatientHealth Questionnaire-4, the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel(MBI-HSS-MP), the perceived stress scale (PSS), and single item insomnia measure wereused. After checking whether the SAVE-3 scale is clustered into a sole factor from SAVE-9 scalebased on principal component analysis with promax rotation, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)was done on the 3 items of the SAVE-3 to examine the factorial validity for a unidimensionalstructure.ResultsaaThe SAVE-3 was clustered with factor loadings from 0.664–0.752, and a CFA revealedthat 3 items of the SAVE-3 cohered together into a unidimensional construct with fit for all of indices(comparative fit index = 1.00;Tucker Lewis index = 1.031;standardized root-mean-square residual= 0.001;root-mean-square-error of approximation = 0.00). The SAVE-3 scale showed acceptablereliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.56 and McDonald’s ω = 0.57) in this sample. A high SAVE-3score correlated significantly with younger age (r = -0.12, p = 0.02), a high PSS score (r = 0.24, p <0.001), a high total score for the MBI-HSS-MP (r = 0.35, p < 0.001) and all of its subscales (emotionalexhaustion, r = 0.40, p < 0.001;personal accomplishment, r = -0.14, p < 0.005;depersonalization,r = 0.39, p < 0.001), and poor sleep quality (r = 0.15, p < 0.001).ConclusionsaaTaken together, the data suggest that SAVE-3 is a reliable, valid, and usable scalefor measuring work-related stress in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 epidemic
新冠肺炎大流行期间,压力和焦虑对病毒性流行病的效用-3项作为评估工作相关压力的工具,以及与医护人员失眠和精疲力竭的关系
背景与目的本研究的目的是探讨压力和焦虑对病毒流行-3项目(SAVE-3)量表作为评估医护人员工作压力的工具的有效性。方法389名参与者均为匿名。采用SAVE-9、patienthehealth Questionnaire-4、Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for医务人员(MBI-HSS-MP)、perceived stress scale (PSS)和单项失眠量表。在检验SAVE-3量表是否从SAVE-9量表中聚为单一因子后,采用主成分分析(promax rotation)对SAVE-3量表的3个项目进行验证性因子分析(confirmatory factor analysis, CFA),检验其对单维度结构的析因效度。结果SAVE-3的因子负荷在0.664 ~ 0.752范围内聚类,CFA分析显示,SAVE-3的3个项目凝聚成一个适合所有指标的一维结构(比较拟合指数= 1.00,Tucker Lewis指数= 1.031,标准化均方根残差= 0.001,近似均方根误差= 0.00)。SAVE-3量表在本样本中具有可接受的信度(Cronbach 's α = 0.56, McDonald 's ω = 0.57)。较高的save -3得分与较年轻(r = -0.12, p = 0.02)、较高的PSS得分(r = 0.24, p <0.001)、较高的mpi - hss - mp总分(r = 0.35, p <0.001)及其所有子量表(情绪耗竭,r = 0.40, p <0.001;个人成就,r = -0.14, p < 0.005;人格解体,r = 0.39, p <0.001)和较差的睡眠质量(r = 0.15, p <0.001)显著相关。综上所述,这些数据表明,SAVE-3是衡量COVID-19流行期间医护人员工作压力的可靠、有效和可用的量表
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine Research
Sleep Medicine Research Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信