Utility of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemic-3 Items as a Tool for Assessing Work-Related Stress, and Relationship With Insomnia and Burnout of Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Hoon Sung Son, M. Ahn, Kyumin Kim, Inn-Kyu Cho, Joohee Lee, S. Suh, Seockhoon Chung
{"title":"Utility of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemic-3 Items as a Tool for Assessing Work-Related Stress, and Relationship With Insomnia and Burnout of Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Hoon Sung Son, M. Ahn, Kyumin Kim, Inn-Kyu Cho, Joohee Lee, S. Suh, Seockhoon Chung","doi":"10.17241/smr.2021.01025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and ObjectiveaaThe aim of this study is to explore the usefulness of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemic-3 items (SAVE-3) scale as a tool for assessing work-related stress inhealthcare workers.MethodsaaThere were 389 participants and all remained anonymous. The SAVE-9, the PatientHealth Questionnaire-4, the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel(MBI-HSS-MP), the perceived stress scale (PSS), and single item insomnia measure wereused. After checking whether the SAVE-3 scale is clustered into a sole factor from SAVE-9 scalebased on principal component analysis with promax rotation, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)was done on the 3 items of the SAVE-3 to examine the factorial validity for a unidimensionalstructure.ResultsaaThe SAVE-3 was clustered with factor loadings from 0.664–0.752, and a CFA revealedthat 3 items of the SAVE-3 cohered together into a unidimensional construct with fit for all of indices(comparative fit index = 1.00;Tucker Lewis index = 1.031;standardized root-mean-square residual= 0.001;root-mean-square-error of approximation = 0.00). The SAVE-3 scale showed acceptablereliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.56 and McDonald’s ω = 0.57) in this sample. A high SAVE-3score correlated significantly with younger age (r = -0.12, p = 0.02), a high PSS score (r = 0.24, p <0.001), a high total score for the MBI-HSS-MP (r = 0.35, p < 0.001) and all of its subscales (emotionalexhaustion, r = 0.40, p < 0.001;personal accomplishment, r = -0.14, p < 0.005;depersonalization,r = 0.39, p < 0.001), and poor sleep quality (r = 0.15, p < 0.001).ConclusionsaaTaken together, the data suggest that SAVE-3 is a reliable, valid, and usable scalefor measuring work-related stress in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 epidemic","PeriodicalId":37318,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17241/smr.2021.01025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Background and ObjectiveaaThe aim of this study is to explore the usefulness of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemic-3 items (SAVE-3) scale as a tool for assessing work-related stress inhealthcare workers.MethodsaaThere were 389 participants and all remained anonymous. The SAVE-9, the PatientHealth Questionnaire-4, the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel(MBI-HSS-MP), the perceived stress scale (PSS), and single item insomnia measure wereused. After checking whether the SAVE-3 scale is clustered into a sole factor from SAVE-9 scalebased on principal component analysis with promax rotation, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)was done on the 3 items of the SAVE-3 to examine the factorial validity for a unidimensionalstructure.ResultsaaThe SAVE-3 was clustered with factor loadings from 0.664–0.752, and a CFA revealedthat 3 items of the SAVE-3 cohered together into a unidimensional construct with fit for all of indices(comparative fit index = 1.00;Tucker Lewis index = 1.031;standardized root-mean-square residual= 0.001;root-mean-square-error of approximation = 0.00). The SAVE-3 scale showed acceptablereliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.56 and McDonald’s ω = 0.57) in this sample. A high SAVE-3score correlated significantly with younger age (r = -0.12, p = 0.02), a high PSS score (r = 0.24, p <0.001), a high total score for the MBI-HSS-MP (r = 0.35, p < 0.001) and all of its subscales (emotionalexhaustion, r = 0.40, p < 0.001;personal accomplishment, r = -0.14, p < 0.005;depersonalization,r = 0.39, p < 0.001), and poor sleep quality (r = 0.15, p < 0.001).ConclusionsaaTaken together, the data suggest that SAVE-3 is a reliable, valid, and usable scalefor measuring work-related stress in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 epidemic