Capability maturity model integration with approach of agile Six Sigma

Q1 Multidisciplinary

International Journal of Agile Systems and Management Pub Date : 2017-03-16 DOI:10.1504/IJASM.2017.082922

Monireh Safaie

{"title":"Capability maturity model integration with approach of agile Six Sigma","authors":"Monireh Safaie","doi":"10.1504/IJASM.2017.082922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organisations have experienced quality techniques to consecutive efficiency and productivity. To gain competition superiority and continuous efficiency, they require unified model including quality techniques and agile manufacturing simultaneously. This article follows with three purposes: 1) to investigate the connection between variables of CMMI, Six Sigma, and AM; 2) to prepare organisations for creation of AM using CMMI and Six Sigma; 3) to priority quality factors in three models (CMMI, Six Sigma, and proposal model) and determine best model that cover quality factors. So, a questionnaire designed and hypotheses studied in fuzzy environment. All of hypotheses are confirmed within (0.005, 0.01). On second purpose, fuzzy logic assessed preparation organisations in creation of AM. Results show organisations are prepared to execute AM. AM factors were prioritised [competency (0/27), ability to respond (0/25), speed (0/25), flexibility (0/23)]. In third purpose, quality factors are defined and measured in Six Sigma (19/7%), CMMI (17/5%), and proposal model (66/6%).","PeriodicalId":38028,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agile Systems and Management","volume":"10 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJASM.2017.082922","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agile Systems and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2017.082922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Organisations have experienced quality techniques to consecutive efficiency and productivity. To gain competition superiority and continuous efficiency, they require unified model including quality techniques and agile manufacturing simultaneously. This article follows with three purposes: 1) to investigate the connection between variables of CMMI, Six Sigma, and AM; 2) to prepare organisations for creation of AM using CMMI and Six Sigma; 3) to priority quality factors in three models (CMMI, Six Sigma, and proposal model) and determine best model that cover quality factors. So, a questionnaire designed and hypotheses studied in fuzzy environment. All of hypotheses are confirmed within (0.005, 0.01). On second purpose, fuzzy logic assessed preparation organisations in creation of AM. Results show organisations are prepared to execute AM. AM factors were prioritised [competency (0/27), ability to respond (0/25), speed (0/25), flexibility (0/23)]. In third purpose, quality factors are defined and measured in Six Sigma (19/7%), CMMI (17/5%), and proposal model (66/6%).

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于敏捷六西格玛方法的能力成熟度模型集成

组织已经体验到了持续提高效率和生产力的高质量技术。为了获得竞争优势和持续的效率，它们需要同时包括质量技术和敏捷制造的统一模型。本文的目的有三：1）研究CMMI、六西格玛和AM变量之间的联系；2）利用CMMI和六西格玛为组织创建AM做好准备；3）在三个模型（CMMI、六西格玛和提案模型）中优先考虑质量因素，并确定涵盖质量因素的最佳模型。因此，在模糊环境下设计了一份调查问卷并对假设进行了研究。所有假设都在（0.005，0.01）内得到了证实。第二个目的是，模糊逻辑评估了AM创建过程中的准备组织。结果显示，组织已做好执行AM的准备。AM因素被优先考虑[能力（0/27）、反应能力（0/25）、速度（2/25）、灵活性（0/23）]。第三个目的是，在六西格玛（19/7%）、CMMI（17/5%）和方案模型（66/6%）中定义和测量质量因素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Agile Systems and Management Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The objective of IJASM is to establish an effective channel of communication between academia, industry and persons concerned with the design and development of systems. Change is eternal and perpetual, irrespective of type of system. Systems created in the course of the advance of human civilization need to be functionally and operationally sustainable amid changes in technological, political, socio-economical, financial, cultural and other environmental challenges. IJASM aims to promote and harmonize knowledge developments in the emerging fields of agile systems research, sustainability and vulnerability analysis, risk assessments methodologies, complex systems science, e-organisation and e-supply chain management, with emphasis on the international dimension, particularly breaking cultural barriers, and on national contexts, globalisation and new business practices. As such, we aim to publish papers presenting new research, innovative theoretical approaches, changes in agile management paradigms, and action (both examples of successes and failures as long as there are important lessons to be learned) from leading scholars and practitioners. Papers generally fall into two broad categories: those grounded in theory and/or papers using scientific research methods (e.g., reports of original empirical studies, models, critical reviews of existing empirical research, theory pieces that clearly extend current thinking); and those focusing on innovative agile approaches that are based on well reasoned extensions of existing research, experiential knowledge, or exemplary cases (e.g., thought pieces, case studies, etc).