Association between stroke and carotid artery blood block interval in trans-carotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A retrospective observational study
Lifan Yang, W. Pan, L. Guan, Xiao-chun Zhang, Lei Zhang, Shasha Chen, Daxin Zhou, J. Ge
{"title":"Association between stroke and carotid artery blood block interval in trans-carotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A retrospective observational study","authors":"Lifan Yang, W. Pan, L. Guan, Xiao-chun Zhang, Lei Zhang, Shasha Chen, Daxin Zhou, J. Ge","doi":"10.4103/2470-7511.327241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Patients undergoing trans-carotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TC-TAVR) are more likely to suffer from a stroke because of cerebral blood hypoperfusion and blood occlusion caused by the introducer sheath compared with the trans-femoral (TF) approach. The present study aimed to compare the incidence of stroke between the TC and TF approaches and explore the causes of stroke after TAVR. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 414 consecutive patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who underwent TC- or TF-TAVR at our center from October 2010 to November 2019; these patients were included in this observational study. The clinical data, such as the incidence of stroke, were compared between TC- and TF-TAVR patients. The correlation between carotid artery blood block interval (CABBI) and neurological events was also analyzed. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University (approval No. YL2014-32). Results: Patients undergoing TC-TAVR had a significantly higher incidence of stroke than those undergoing TF-TAVR (12.5% vs. 0, P < 0.001), whereas the baseline data and the incidence of other complications did not differ significantly between the patients undergoing TC- and TF-TAVR (P > 0.05). Moreover, in TC-TAVR patients, the average CABBI of stroke was significantly longer than that of nonstroke patients (61.7 ± 20.7 min vs. 25.1 ± 1.6 min, P = 0.001). The number of patients with CABBI >30 min in the stroke group was greater than that in the nonstroke group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: In the absence of the cerebral and carotid artery evaluation before TAVR, surgeons should take into consideration the time of CABBI <30 min to avoid the possibility of stroke.","PeriodicalId":52908,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Plus","volume":"6 1","pages":"181 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2470-7511.327241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Patients undergoing trans-carotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TC-TAVR) are more likely to suffer from a stroke because of cerebral blood hypoperfusion and blood occlusion caused by the introducer sheath compared with the trans-femoral (TF) approach. The present study aimed to compare the incidence of stroke between the TC and TF approaches and explore the causes of stroke after TAVR. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 414 consecutive patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who underwent TC- or TF-TAVR at our center from October 2010 to November 2019; these patients were included in this observational study. The clinical data, such as the incidence of stroke, were compared between TC- and TF-TAVR patients. The correlation between carotid artery blood block interval (CABBI) and neurological events was also analyzed. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University (approval No. YL2014-32). Results: Patients undergoing TC-TAVR had a significantly higher incidence of stroke than those undergoing TF-TAVR (12.5% vs. 0, P < 0.001), whereas the baseline data and the incidence of other complications did not differ significantly between the patients undergoing TC- and TF-TAVR (P > 0.05). Moreover, in TC-TAVR patients, the average CABBI of stroke was significantly longer than that of nonstroke patients (61.7 ± 20.7 min vs. 25.1 ± 1.6 min, P = 0.001). The number of patients with CABBI >30 min in the stroke group was greater than that in the nonstroke group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: In the absence of the cerebral and carotid artery evaluation before TAVR, surgeons should take into consideration the time of CABBI <30 min to avoid the possibility of stroke.
目的:与经股动脉(TF)入路相比,经颈动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TC-TAVR)患者更容易发生脑卒中,因为引入器鞘引起的脑血灌注不足和血液闭塞。本研究旨在比较TAVR入路与TF入路的卒中发生率,并探讨TAVR后卒中的原因。方法:回顾性分析2010年10月至2019年11月在本中心连续接受TC或TF-TAVR治疗的414例严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的病历;这些患者被纳入这项观察性研究。比较TC- tavr和TF-TAVR患者的临床资料,如卒中发生率。分析颈动脉血阻断间隔(CABBI)与神经事件的相关性。本研究已获复旦大学中山医院伦理委员会批准(批准号:YL2014-32)。结果:TC- tavr患者卒中发生率明显高于TF-TAVR患者(12.5% vs. 0, P < 0.001),而TC- tavr和TF-TAVR患者的基线数据和其他并发症发生率无显著差异(P < 0.05)。此外,TC-TAVR患者卒中的平均CABBI明显长于非卒中患者(61.7±20.7 min vs. 25.1±1.6 min, P = 0.001)。卒中组bbb30 min发生CABBI的患者数大于非卒中组(P < 0.001)。结论:在TAVR术前未进行脑动脉和颈动脉评估的情况下,外科医生应考虑CABBI时间< 30min,以避免发生脑卒中的可能性。