EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMMES AND OCCUPATIONAL SOCIAL WORK: INTERRELATED WITH DISTINCT FEATURES

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Lourie Terblanche, Thula Gunya, M. Pretorius, Magalane Reuben Maruma, K. Mbuyisa, T. Maseko, K. Mojapelo, N. Myeni, Warren David Tyson
{"title":"EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMMES AND OCCUPATIONAL SOCIAL WORK: INTERRELATED WITH DISTINCT FEATURES","authors":"Lourie Terblanche, Thula Gunya, M. Pretorius, Magalane Reuben Maruma, K. Mbuyisa, T. Maseko, K. Mojapelo, N. Myeni, Warren David Tyson","doi":"10.15270/57-1-904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A research project was undertaken to explore the differences and similarities between employee assistance programmes (EAPs) and occupational social work (OSW). This was done in order to provide clear and distinct guidelines to potential employers/corporate clients regarding a choice between occupational social work (OSW) and employee assistance programmes (EAP) when they are considering the introduction of programmes and services to promote the psycho-social functioning and productivity of employees and the successful operation of the workplace at large. In addition to the literature study on these two concepts, occupational social work and employee assistance programmes, an empirical study was conducted, consisting of a qualitative and a quantitative component. The qualitative study was performed by a number of researchers who used the same data-collection instrument, developed by the group of researchers under the supervision of the main author of this article. Data were, however, collected in different ways, i.e. one-on-one personal interviews, interviews via e-mail, and focus group interviews. The quantitative part was performed through an on-line survey with a self-developed questionnaire, also under the supervision of the main author. Findings confirmed that both the EAPs and OSW deal with work-related, personal, interpersonal and productivity issues. The findings further confirmed that the kind of employee issues addressed dealt with a range of concerns, including substance abuse, stress, trauma, financial difficulties, conflict, absenteeism, employee development and bereavement. Despite a number of similarities between OSW and EAPs, very few differences have been confirmed other than the variables impacting on structure and legalisation, which also confirms why the EAP and the OSW cannot be used as interchangeable concepts.","PeriodicalId":44671,"journal":{"name":"Social Work-Maatskaplike Werk","volume":"57 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work-Maatskaplike Werk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15270/57-1-904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A research project was undertaken to explore the differences and similarities between employee assistance programmes (EAPs) and occupational social work (OSW). This was done in order to provide clear and distinct guidelines to potential employers/corporate clients regarding a choice between occupational social work (OSW) and employee assistance programmes (EAP) when they are considering the introduction of programmes and services to promote the psycho-social functioning and productivity of employees and the successful operation of the workplace at large. In addition to the literature study on these two concepts, occupational social work and employee assistance programmes, an empirical study was conducted, consisting of a qualitative and a quantitative component. The qualitative study was performed by a number of researchers who used the same data-collection instrument, developed by the group of researchers under the supervision of the main author of this article. Data were, however, collected in different ways, i.e. one-on-one personal interviews, interviews via e-mail, and focus group interviews. The quantitative part was performed through an on-line survey with a self-developed questionnaire, also under the supervision of the main author. Findings confirmed that both the EAPs and OSW deal with work-related, personal, interpersonal and productivity issues. The findings further confirmed that the kind of employee issues addressed dealt with a range of concerns, including substance abuse, stress, trauma, financial difficulties, conflict, absenteeism, employee development and bereavement. Despite a number of similarities between OSW and EAPs, very few differences have been confirmed other than the variables impacting on structure and legalisation, which also confirms why the EAP and the OSW cannot be used as interchangeable concepts.
雇员援助方案和职业社会工作:相互关联,各具特色
开展了一项研究项目,探讨雇员援助方案(EAPs)与职业社会工作(OSW)之间的异同。这样做是为了向潜在雇主/公司客户提供明确和明确的指导方针,以便他们在考虑引入促进雇员心理社会功能和生产力以及整个工作场所成功运作的方案和服务时,在职业社会工作(OSW)和雇员援助计划(EAP)之间做出选择。除了对职业社会工作和雇员援助方案这两个概念的文献研究外,还进行了一项由定性和定量组成的实证研究。定性研究是由一些研究人员进行的,他们使用相同的数据收集工具,由研究人员在本文主要作者的监督下开发。然而,数据收集的方式不同,即一对一的个人访谈,通过电子邮件访谈和焦点小组访谈。定量部分是在主要作者的监督下,通过自行开发的问卷进行在线调查。调查结果证实,员工福利计划和员工福利计划都处理与工作有关、个人、人际关系和生产力的问题。调查结果进一步证实,所处理的员工问题涉及一系列问题,包括药物滥用、压力、创伤、经济困难、冲突、缺勤、员工发展和丧亲之痛。尽管开放式工作计划和开放式工作计划之间有许多相似之处,但除了影响结构和合法化的变量外,几乎没有什么不同之处,这也证实了为什么开放式工作计划和开放式工作计划不能作为可互换的概念使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: This South African academic peer-reviewed journal publishes articles, book reviews and commentary from all field of social work. Manuscripts covering amongst others the following, are considered for publication: social work, welfare organizations, society, social welfare, family and child care, community work, substance abuse, substance dependence, welfare law, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信