RESTORATION OF FORMER GRASSLAND IN SOUTH-CENTRAL TEXAS

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Wendy J. Leonard, O. V. Auken
{"title":"RESTORATION OF FORMER GRASSLAND IN SOUTH-CENTRAL TEXAS","authors":"Wendy J. Leonard, O. V. Auken","doi":"10.32011/TXJSCI_71_1_ARTICLE2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the past, grasslands and savannas were common in many areas of south-central Texas, including the San Antonio area. With the advent of European settlers and their livestock, much of this area was converted to agriculture and rangeland. Today, most of San Antonio is developed, but some preservation has occurred. Restored grassland, mechanically cleared of Juniperus ashei (juniper, Ashe juniper) and other woody species in 2013, was examined and compared to adjacent non-cleared woodland. The woodland examined was dominated by Diospyros texana (Texas persimmon) and Juniperus ashei. Richness in the woodland canopy was 15 species. The understory below the canopy had 25 woody species. In the restored grassland area, herbaceous plant cover was 41.8%, woody plant cover 5.8%, bare soil 2.9%, and litter cover 49.5%. Species richness was 71, with 60 herbaceous and 11 woody species (percent cover of each from <0.1–7.1%). The most common species in the restored grassland in descending order were Nassella leucotricha (Texas winter grass), Calyptocarpus vialis (straggler daisy), Carex planostachys (cedar sedge), Sporobolus crypandrus (sand dropseed), D. texana, and Verbesina virginica (frost weed). Several C4 grass species were present with low cover but may increase in abundance over time. Four of the six most common restored grassland species were present below the woodland canopy and 12 woody species were present in the restored grassland as juveniles. Cost of restoration was approximately $38,500 ($7,500 supplies, $31,000 labor).","PeriodicalId":54431,"journal":{"name":"The Texas Journal of Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Texas Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32011/TXJSCI_71_1_ARTICLE2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the past, grasslands and savannas were common in many areas of south-central Texas, including the San Antonio area. With the advent of European settlers and their livestock, much of this area was converted to agriculture and rangeland. Today, most of San Antonio is developed, but some preservation has occurred. Restored grassland, mechanically cleared of Juniperus ashei (juniper, Ashe juniper) and other woody species in 2013, was examined and compared to adjacent non-cleared woodland. The woodland examined was dominated by Diospyros texana (Texas persimmon) and Juniperus ashei. Richness in the woodland canopy was 15 species. The understory below the canopy had 25 woody species. In the restored grassland area, herbaceous plant cover was 41.8%, woody plant cover 5.8%, bare soil 2.9%, and litter cover 49.5%. Species richness was 71, with 60 herbaceous and 11 woody species (percent cover of each from <0.1–7.1%). The most common species in the restored grassland in descending order were Nassella leucotricha (Texas winter grass), Calyptocarpus vialis (straggler daisy), Carex planostachys (cedar sedge), Sporobolus crypandrus (sand dropseed), D. texana, and Verbesina virginica (frost weed). Several C4 grass species were present with low cover but may increase in abundance over time. Four of the six most common restored grassland species were present below the woodland canopy and 12 woody species were present in the restored grassland as juveniles. Cost of restoration was approximately $38,500 ($7,500 supplies, $31,000 labor).
德克萨斯州中南部原草原的恢复
过去,草原和稀树草原在德克萨斯州中南部的许多地区很常见,包括圣安东尼奥地区。随着欧洲定居者及其牲畜的出现,该地区的大部分地区被改为农业和牧场。今天,圣安东尼奥的大部分地区都已开发,但也有一些保存。2013年,对恢复后的草原进行了检查,并将其与邻近的未清理林地进行了比较。所调查的林地主要为Diospyros texana(得克萨斯柿子)和Juniperus ashei。林地林冠丰富度为15种。树冠下的下层林有25种木本植物。在恢复草原地区,草本植物覆盖率为41.8%,木本植物覆盖率5.8%,裸土覆盖率2.9%,枯枝落叶覆盖率49.5%。物种丰富度为71种,草本植物60种,木本植物11种(每种覆盖率<0.1–7.1%)。恢复草原中最常见的物种按降序排列为:Nassella leucotricha(得克萨斯州冬草)、Calyptocarpus vialis(掉队菊花),Carex planostachys(雪松莎草)、Sporobolus crypandrus(沙籽)、D.texana和Verbesina virginica(霜草)。一些C4草物种的覆盖率较低,但数量可能会随着时间的推移而增加。六种最常见的恢复草原物种中有四种存在于林地树冠下方,12种木本物种在恢复草原中幼年时存在。修复费用约为38500美元(7500美元的用品,31000美元的劳动力)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Texas Journal of Science
The Texas Journal of Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Scholarly manuscripts reporting original research results in any field of science or technology, including science education, will be considered for publication in The Texas Journal of Science. Prior to acceptance, each manuscript will be reviewed by both knowledgeable peers and the editorial staff. Authors are encouraged to suggest the names and addresses of two potential reviewers to the Manuscript Editor at the time of submission of their manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书