Factores asociados al rechazo del método anticonceptivo vasectomía en población masculina de Chile

Q4 Medicine
Naira Compiano Marguart, Víctor Lagos Castillo, Claudia Larenas Gacitúa, María Valdivia Vásquez, Ramon Gelabert Santané, Bárbara Cerda Aedo
{"title":"Factores asociados al rechazo del método anticonceptivo vasectomía en población masculina de Chile","authors":"Naira Compiano Marguart, Víctor Lagos Castillo, Claudia Larenas Gacitúa, María Valdivia Vásquez, Ramon Gelabert Santané, Bárbara Cerda Aedo","doi":"10.51288/00830209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Identify relevant factors associated with vasectomy rejection in the male population of Chile, between 30 and 60 years. Methodology: The sample was surveyed through Google Forms, with a questionnaire that measured beliefs towards vasectomy, through a Likert-type scale. The statistical tests used were chi-square and Fisher’s exact test. Results: The most relevant factors were membership of a religious group and region of residence. Participants who did not identify with any religious group had a lower negative perception of vasectom (p = 0,0435). Conclusion: Vasectomy is prejudiced by lack of knowledge and accessibility to it. Therefore, there is an urgent need for greater dissemination of its benefits in the public and private health system, also, implement accessibility programs for men who do not intend to have children in the future.","PeriodicalId":35674,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecologia de Venezuela","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecologia de Venezuela","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51288/00830209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Identify relevant factors associated with vasectomy rejection in the male population of Chile, between 30 and 60 years. Methodology: The sample was surveyed through Google Forms, with a questionnaire that measured beliefs towards vasectomy, through a Likert-type scale. The statistical tests used were chi-square and Fisher’s exact test. Results: The most relevant factors were membership of a religious group and region of residence. Participants who did not identify with any religious group had a lower negative perception of vasectom (p = 0,0435). Conclusion: Vasectomy is prejudiced by lack of knowledge and accessibility to it. Therefore, there is an urgent need for greater dissemination of its benefits in the public and private health system, also, implement accessibility programs for men who do not intend to have children in the future.
智利男性人群拒绝输精管切除避孕方法的相关因素
目的:确定智利30至60岁男性人群输精管切除术排斥反应的相关因素。方法:通过谷歌表格对样本进行调查,并通过Likert型量表对输精管切除术的信念进行问卷调查。使用的统计检验是卡方检验和Fisher精确检验。结果:最相关的因素是宗教团体的成员和居住地区。不认同任何宗教团体的参与者对输精管切除术的负面认知较低(p=0.0435)。结论:输精管切除术由于缺乏知识和可及性而受到损害。因此,迫切需要在公共和私人卫生系统中更多地宣传其益处,并为未来不打算生育的男性实施无障碍计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecologia de Venezuela
Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecologia de Venezuela Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecología de Venezuela. Sociedad de Obstetricia y Ginecología de Venezuela. Ayudar a todos los médicos prácticos a mantenerse al día en los desarrollos a medida que ocurren en Obstetricia y Ginecología. Trimestral. Rev. Osbtet. Ginecol. Venez
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信