Awakening the Serpent King: Ritual and Textual Ontologies in Garhwal, Uttarakhand

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
Aftab S. Jassal
{"title":"Awakening the Serpent King: Ritual and Textual Ontologies in Garhwal, Uttarakhand","authors":"Aftab S. Jassal","doi":"10.1093/jhs/hiaa009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the north Indian state of Uttarakhand, the god Nagaraja, associated with the pan--Indian god Krishna, is an extremely popular deity. However, there exist key disjunctures in how Nagaraja is known, experienced and worshiped in the north Indian state of Uttarakhand by jāgar performers—low--caste ritual specialists, storytellers, and musicians—on the one hand, and high--caste temple priests, on the other. Temple priests were generally dismissive of the practices of the jāgar performers, often re--directing my interest in regional narratives of Nagaraja to the Sanskrit--language Bhagavadgita and Bhagavata Purana (the Gita--Bhagavat), which they saw as authoritative and ‘original' sources of oral and vernacular traditions. This interpretation, however, was highly contested by jāgar performers who articulated a non--essentialist, ritually efficacious, rhetorical, oral and vernacular ‘textual ontology.' Jāgar performers not only critiqued Brahminical notions of textual purity and essentialism but also assumptions within the academic study of Hinduism about the relationship between vernacular religious practices and textual Hinduism, or the so--called Great and Little traditions of Hinduism. By ‘textual ontology,' I describe how different relations to textual authority and knowledge in turn reveal distinctive ways of creating, knowing, and interacting with deities and the world. In challenging priestly and western scholarly notions of text, this article offers a radically different view of textual production, transmission, and authority.","PeriodicalId":42357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hindu Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"101-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/jhs/hiaa009","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hindu Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhs/hiaa009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the north Indian state of Uttarakhand, the god Nagaraja, associated with the pan--Indian god Krishna, is an extremely popular deity. However, there exist key disjunctures in how Nagaraja is known, experienced and worshiped in the north Indian state of Uttarakhand by jāgar performers—low--caste ritual specialists, storytellers, and musicians—on the one hand, and high--caste temple priests, on the other. Temple priests were generally dismissive of the practices of the jāgar performers, often re--directing my interest in regional narratives of Nagaraja to the Sanskrit--language Bhagavadgita and Bhagavata Purana (the Gita--Bhagavat), which they saw as authoritative and ‘original' sources of oral and vernacular traditions. This interpretation, however, was highly contested by jāgar performers who articulated a non--essentialist, ritually efficacious, rhetorical, oral and vernacular ‘textual ontology.' Jāgar performers not only critiqued Brahminical notions of textual purity and essentialism but also assumptions within the academic study of Hinduism about the relationship between vernacular religious practices and textual Hinduism, or the so--called Great and Little traditions of Hinduism. By ‘textual ontology,' I describe how different relations to textual authority and knowledge in turn reveal distinctive ways of creating, knowing, and interacting with deities and the world. In challenging priestly and western scholarly notions of text, this article offers a radically different view of textual production, transmission, and authority.
唤醒蛇王:北阿坎德邦加瓦尔的仪式与文本本体论
在印度北部的北阿坎德邦,与泛印度神克利须那联系在一起的那加拉贾神是一位非常受欢迎的神。然而,在印度北部北阿坎德邦,低种姓的仪式专家、讲故事的人和音乐家,以及高种姓的寺庙牧师,对Nagaraja的认识、体验和崇拜存在着关键的脱节。寺庙牧师通常对贾加表演者的做法不屑一顾,他们经常将我对那加拉贾地区叙事的兴趣重新引导到梵语《薄伽梵歌》和《薄伽梵歌》(Gita-Bhagavat),他们认为这是口头和本土传统的权威和“原始”来源。然而,这种解释受到了贾加表演者的强烈质疑,他们表达了一种非本质主义的、仪式有效的、修辞的、口头的和白话的“文本本体论”Jāgar的表演者不仅批评了婆罗门关于文本纯洁性和本质主义的概念,而且还批评了印度教学术研究中关于本土宗教实践与文本印度教之间关系的假设,即所谓的印度教大传统和小传统。通过“文本本体论”,我描述了与文本权威和知识的不同关系如何反过来揭示了创造、认识和与神和世界互动的独特方式。在挑战神职人员和西方学术界对文本的概念时,本文对文本的产生、传播和权威提出了截然不同的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hindu Studies is committed to a critical approach to Hindu Studies, focusing on themes that address overarching issues within the field, publishing the proceedings of research projects and conferences, and providing a forum for peer-reviewed articles. The journal aims to create a forum for constructive interdisciplinary discourse by linking the wider community of scholars in an exploration of key questions, through the lens of their own research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信