SYAIR DIRAJA MELAYU PERAK-JOHOR ERA KONTEMPORARI: SATU PERBANDINGAN KEPENGARANGAN (Royal Syair in the Contemporary Era of Perak-Johor: Comparison of Authorship)

R. Ibrahim, Muammar Ghaddafi Hanafiah, Shaiful Bahri Md. Radzi
{"title":"SYAIR DIRAJA MELAYU PERAK-JOHOR ERA KONTEMPORARI: SATU PERBANDINGAN KEPENGARANGAN (Royal Syair in the Contemporary Era of Perak-Johor: Comparison of Authorship)","authors":"R. Ibrahim, Muammar Ghaddafi Hanafiah, Shaiful Bahri Md. Radzi","doi":"10.17576/malim-2021-2201-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 16th century to the end of the 19th century, storytelling and praise of the sultan became the idea of authorship. This storytelling and praise are conveyed by making poetry his platform. The last poem to record the history of this Royal group was the Syair Riwayat Yang Amat Mulia Tengku Ampuan Besar Pahang (1953). However, such influence is less used when modern literature develops. Western powers bring a new diversity of forms and genres in creation. After 56 years, two works have emerged, Syair Sultan Azlan Shah Berjiwa Rakyat (2009), Mohd Ibrahim bin Said and Syair DYMM Sultan Ibrahim Ibni Almarhum Sultan Iskandar (2018) by Maskiah binti Masrom in this contemporary era. Kings and sultans became objects of storytelling in both works. The question is, what are the scopes or criteria that are the ideas of their authorship? The scope or criterion that became the idea of authorship used by both authors in presenting storytelling about their rulers. Both texts of the Royal poetry were sampled. Comparative methods are applied to examine their influence in presenting the idea of Royal history recordings in the contemporary era. Intrinsically research methods on study samples were also used. The findings found that the king's biography became the scope or criterion that became the idea of authorship for both authors in praise and upholding his king. Keywords: Literary criticism; Peering; Authorship; Royal syair; Contemporary syair","PeriodicalId":33840,"journal":{"name":"MALIM Jurnal Pengajian Umum Asia Tenggara","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MALIM Jurnal Pengajian Umum Asia Tenggara","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/malim-2021-2201-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 16th century to the end of the 19th century, storytelling and praise of the sultan became the idea of authorship. This storytelling and praise are conveyed by making poetry his platform. The last poem to record the history of this Royal group was the Syair Riwayat Yang Amat Mulia Tengku Ampuan Besar Pahang (1953). However, such influence is less used when modern literature develops. Western powers bring a new diversity of forms and genres in creation. After 56 years, two works have emerged, Syair Sultan Azlan Shah Berjiwa Rakyat (2009), Mohd Ibrahim bin Said and Syair DYMM Sultan Ibrahim Ibni Almarhum Sultan Iskandar (2018) by Maskiah binti Masrom in this contemporary era. Kings and sultans became objects of storytelling in both works. The question is, what are the scopes or criteria that are the ideas of their authorship? The scope or criterion that became the idea of authorship used by both authors in presenting storytelling about their rulers. Both texts of the Royal poetry were sampled. Comparative methods are applied to examine their influence in presenting the idea of Royal history recordings in the contemporary era. Intrinsically research methods on study samples were also used. The findings found that the king's biography became the scope or criterion that became the idea of authorship for both authors in praise and upholding his king. Keywords: Literary criticism; Peering; Authorship; Royal syair; Contemporary syair
当代霹雳柔佛的真实Syair:作家比较
从16世纪到19世纪末,讲故事和赞美苏丹成为了作者的想法。这种讲故事和赞美是通过诗歌作为他的平台来传达的。最后一首记录这一皇家团体历史的诗是Syair Riwayat Yang Amat Mulia Tengku Ampuan Besar Pahang(1953)。然而,在现代文学发展的过程中,这种影响很少被使用。西方列强在创作中带来了新的形式和流派的多样性。56年后,马斯基亚·宾蒂·马斯罗姆的《Syair Sultan Azlan Shah Berjiwa Rakyat》(2009年)、《Mohd Ibrahim bin Said》和《Syair DYMM Sultan Ibrahim Ibni Almhum Sultan Iskandar》(2018年)在当代出现了两部作品。国王和苏丹在这两部作品中都成为了讲故事的对象。问题是,他们的作者思想的范围或标准是什么?两位作者在讲述统治者的故事时使用的范围或标准,成为了作者的概念。皇家诗歌的两个文本都是抽样的。运用比较的方法来考察它们对当代皇家史籍观念呈现的影响。还使用了对研究样本进行本质研究的方法。研究结果发现,国王的传记成为了两位作者赞扬和支持国王的范围或标准。关键词:文学批评;Peering;作者身份;皇家syair;现代syair
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信