Content based learning-Task based learning-Problem based learning in Teaching Romanian Language to Foreign Students

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Gabriel Barbulet
{"title":"Content based learning-Task based learning-Problem based learning in Teaching Romanian Language to Foreign Students","authors":"Gabriel Barbulet","doi":"10.35824/sjrs.v5i2.23924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When talking about the process of Romanian language teaching, learning and using the Romanian language, leads us to the idea that we are faced with a considerably large number of variables. No matter what happens during the process, there is always something good to acquire and put into practice. Despite this “methodological painkiller”, boosting efficiency is the determining factor. In the practical, everyday management of classes, it is common knowledge that it is more challenging for a teacher to do something “inappropriate” than to do it “correctly”. However, considering that almost all actions count, the teachers’ exclusive attention to the process comes as a necessity. As for the rest of the process, the things we have mentioned above are to be seen in a different way. Natural Romanian usage involves fluency and one can get the impression that Romanian is not difficult to learn and activate. It is pointless to say that this is a determining factor in encouraging students to be part of the “effort”. In contrast, artificial, highly automated Romanian tends to change into a nightmare for both teachers and learners. The context of CBL, TBL and PBL is represented by Communicative language teaching. The communicative approach was developed mainly by British applied linguists in the 1980s as a reaction against grammar-based approaches like situational language teaching and the audiolingual method. Strange as it may seem, the foreign language being taught during modern/current classes tends to lose the center of attention in this context. The main focus of attention is no longer on language but on some relevant subjects. Indeed, language should not be an end but a means. In different terms, the process works mostly with message-focused activities rather than form-focused ones. When it comes to modern approaches, the term “learning” becomes a very general one, mainly biased in favor of acquisition.","PeriodicalId":36723,"journal":{"name":"Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v5i2.23924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When talking about the process of Romanian language teaching, learning and using the Romanian language, leads us to the idea that we are faced with a considerably large number of variables. No matter what happens during the process, there is always something good to acquire and put into practice. Despite this “methodological painkiller”, boosting efficiency is the determining factor. In the practical, everyday management of classes, it is common knowledge that it is more challenging for a teacher to do something “inappropriate” than to do it “correctly”. However, considering that almost all actions count, the teachers’ exclusive attention to the process comes as a necessity. As for the rest of the process, the things we have mentioned above are to be seen in a different way. Natural Romanian usage involves fluency and one can get the impression that Romanian is not difficult to learn and activate. It is pointless to say that this is a determining factor in encouraging students to be part of the “effort”. In contrast, artificial, highly automated Romanian tends to change into a nightmare for both teachers and learners. The context of CBL, TBL and PBL is represented by Communicative language teaching. The communicative approach was developed mainly by British applied linguists in the 1980s as a reaction against grammar-based approaches like situational language teaching and the audiolingual method. Strange as it may seem, the foreign language being taught during modern/current classes tends to lose the center of attention in this context. The main focus of attention is no longer on language but on some relevant subjects. Indeed, language should not be an end but a means. In different terms, the process works mostly with message-focused activities rather than form-focused ones. When it comes to modern approaches, the term “learning” becomes a very general one, mainly biased in favor of acquisition.
基于内容的学习任务型学习外国学生罗马尼亚语教学中的问题型学习
当谈到罗马尼亚语的教学、学习和使用过程时,我们会想到我们面临着相当多的变量。无论这个过程中发生了什么,总有一些好的东西可以获得并付诸实践。尽管有这种“方法上的止痛药”,但提高效率是决定性因素。在实际的日常课堂管理中,众所周知,老师做一些“不恰当”的事情比做“正确”的事情更具挑战性。然而,考虑到几乎所有的行动都很重要,教师对这个过程的专门关注是必要的。至于剩下的过程,我们将以不同的方式看待上面提到的事情。罗马尼亚语的自然用法涉及流利性,人们会觉得罗马尼亚语不难学习和激活。说这是鼓励学生参与“努力”的决定性因素是毫无意义的。相比之下,人工的、高度自动化的罗马尼亚语往往会变成老师和学习者的噩梦。CBL、TBL和PBL的语境以交际语言教学为代表。交际法主要是由英国应用语言学家在20世纪80年代发展起来的,是对情景语言教学和听语教学等基于语法的方法的反应。尽管看起来很奇怪,但在这种情况下,现代/当前课堂上教授的外语往往会失去注意力的中心。注意力的主要焦点不再是语言,而是一些相关的主题。事实上,语言不应该是目的,而应该是手段。从不同的角度来看,这个过程主要与以消息为中心的活动一起工作,而不是与以形式为中心的那些活动一起工作。当谈到现代方法时,“学习”一词变得非常普遍,主要偏向于习得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies
Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信