{"title":"The controllability of the Technosphere, an impossible question","authors":"Pauline Picot, B. Guillaume","doi":"10.1177/20530196231187242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of ‘technosphere’ has been proposed to refer to the whole of technological infrastructures, stressing the importance of technology in the Anthropocene. Peter K Haff introduced it in the field of Earth System Science a decade ago. His argument entangles the claim of the technosphere’s uncontrollability with an attempt to overcome anthropocentrism. We develop a critical analysis of this proposal, enriched by a literature review. The idea of a ‘technosphere’ has been present in the scientific literature for at least 50 years. We provide an analysis of the evolution of the uses of the ‘technosphere’ before Haff’s publications. Then, we discuss in which ways Haff’s contribution is in continuity or rupture with these older views. Finally, we argue that the technosphere has little relevance when addressing the question of technology controllability and for overcoming anthropocentrism. This leads us to introduce an alternative proposal to the technosphere: ‘technodiversity’.","PeriodicalId":74943,"journal":{"name":"The anthropocene review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The anthropocene review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196231187242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The notion of ‘technosphere’ has been proposed to refer to the whole of technological infrastructures, stressing the importance of technology in the Anthropocene. Peter K Haff introduced it in the field of Earth System Science a decade ago. His argument entangles the claim of the technosphere’s uncontrollability with an attempt to overcome anthropocentrism. We develop a critical analysis of this proposal, enriched by a literature review. The idea of a ‘technosphere’ has been present in the scientific literature for at least 50 years. We provide an analysis of the evolution of the uses of the ‘technosphere’ before Haff’s publications. Then, we discuss in which ways Haff’s contribution is in continuity or rupture with these older views. Finally, we argue that the technosphere has little relevance when addressing the question of technology controllability and for overcoming anthropocentrism. This leads us to introduce an alternative proposal to the technosphere: ‘technodiversity’.
“技术领域”的概念被提出是指整个技术基础设施,强调了技术在人类世的重要性。十年前,Peter K Haff在地球系统科学领域介绍了它。他的论点将技术领域的不可控制性与克服人类中心主义的努力纠缠在一起。我们对这一建议进行了批判性分析,并通过文献综述进行了丰富。“技术领域”的概念在科学文献中已经存在了至少50年 年。在哈夫出版之前,我们对“技术领域”的使用演变进行了分析。然后,我们讨论了哈夫在哪些方面的贡献与这些旧观点是连续的或断裂的。最后,我们认为,在解决技术可控性问题和克服人类中心主义问题时,技术领域几乎没有相关性。这导致我们提出了一个技术领域的替代方案:“技术多样性”。