Associations Between Vocal Arousal and Dyadic Coping During Couple Interactions After a Stress Induction.

Lisanne J Bulling, Peter Hilpert, Isabella C Bertschi, Ana Ivic, Guy Bodenmann
{"title":"Associations Between Vocal Arousal and Dyadic Coping During Couple Interactions After a Stress Induction.","authors":"Lisanne J Bulling, Peter Hilpert, Isabella C Bertschi, Ana Ivic, Guy Bodenmann","doi":"10.1007/s41042-023-00087-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is well known that although relationship external stressors can harm couples, dyadic coping behavior can buffer the negative effects of stress. Thus far, however, less is known about how vocally encoded stress (i.e., <i>f</i><sub>0</sub>) might affect the stress-coping process in couples during an interaction. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to compare two different stress hypotheses (i.e., paraverbal communication stress hypothesis and emotional resonance hypothesis). We observed 187 mixed-gender couples (<i>N</i> = 374 participants) interacting naturally after an experimental stress induction (Trier Social Stress Test), for which couples were randomly allocated into three groups (women stressed, men stressed, and both stressed). Results of a multi-group actor-partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM) show that either the paraverbal communication stress hypothesis or the emotional resonance hypothesis could be confirmed, depending on whether the man, the woman, or both partners were stressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73424,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied positive psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10754724/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied positive psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-023-00087-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is well known that although relationship external stressors can harm couples, dyadic coping behavior can buffer the negative effects of stress. Thus far, however, less is known about how vocally encoded stress (i.e., f0) might affect the stress-coping process in couples during an interaction. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to compare two different stress hypotheses (i.e., paraverbal communication stress hypothesis and emotional resonance hypothesis). We observed 187 mixed-gender couples (N = 374 participants) interacting naturally after an experimental stress induction (Trier Social Stress Test), for which couples were randomly allocated into three groups (women stressed, men stressed, and both stressed). Results of a multi-group actor-partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM) show that either the paraverbal communication stress hypothesis or the emotional resonance hypothesis could be confirmed, depending on whether the man, the woman, or both partners were stressed.

应激诱导后夫妻互动过程中的发声唤起与二元应对的关系
众所周知,虽然夫妻关系中的外部压力会对夫妻造成伤害,但夫妻间的应对行为可以缓冲压力的负面影响。然而,到目前为止,人们还不太了解在互动过程中,声音编码的压力(即 f0)会如何影响夫妻的压力应对过程。因此,本研究的目标是比较两种不同的压力假说(即副语言交流压力假说和情感共鸣假说)。我们观察了 187 对混合性别的情侣(N = 374 名参与者)在实验性压力诱导(特里尔社会压力测试)后的自然互动,并将情侣随机分为三组(女性压力组、男性压力组和双方都有压力组)。多组演员-伴侣相互依赖调解模型(APIMeM)的结果表明,副语言沟通压力假说或情感共鸣假说都可以得到证实,这取决于是男性、女性还是双方都有压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信