The Forms of Socialization Within Associations of Local Social Services: The “Conviviality” in Question

Q3 Social Sciences

Swiss Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.2478/sjs-2021-0022

Joseph Vaessen

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article questions the political potential of associations of local social services, starting from an analysis of the forms of socialization, following the meaning given to this category by Simmel, Mead, and their posterity in Goffman’s sociology. It is based on an ethnography carried out in three local associations of the Belgian Red Cross. It shows the obstacles to “conviviality” and to the emergence of politics in these associations.

查看原文本刊更多论文

地方社会服务协会内部的社会化形式：有问题的“欢乐”

摘要本文从社会化形式的分析入手，根据西梅尔、米德及其后代在戈夫曼社会学中对这一类别的定义，对地方社会服务协会的政治潜力提出质疑。它以比利时红十字会三个地方协会的民族志为基础。它显示了“欢乐”和政治在这些协会中出现的障碍。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Swiss Journal of Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

50 weeks

期刊介绍： The Swiss Journal of Sociology was established in 1975 on the initiative of the Swiss Sociological Association. It is published by Seismo and appears three times a year with the support of the Swiss Academy of Humanities and Social Sciences. Since 2016, all the articles of the Swiss Journal of Sociology are available as open access documents on De Gruyter Open: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/sjs The journal is a multilingual voice for analysis and research in sociology. It publishes work on the theory, methods, practice, and history of the social sciences in English, French, or German. Although a central aim of the Journal is to reflect the state of the discipline in Switzerland as well as current developments, articles, research notes, debates, and book reviews will be accepted irrespective of the author’s nationality or whether the submitted work focuses on this country. The journal is understood as a representative medium and therefore open to all research areas, to a plurality of schools and methodological approaches. It neither favours nor excludes any research orientation but particularly intends to promote communication between different perspectives. In order to fulfil this aim, all submissions will be refereed anonymously by at least two reviewers.