Dis/ableism in the "Problem of Claudius": The Reception of Claudius's Disabilities in the Ancient Sources

Daniel James Kershaw
{"title":"Dis/ableism in the \"Problem of Claudius\": The Reception of Claudius's Disabilities in the Ancient Sources","authors":"Daniel James Kershaw","doi":"10.5406/23285265.47.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:By utilizing methodological frameworks and techniques employed in Disability Studies and Disability History, this article aims to attenuate the historiographical \"problem of Claudius.\" Scholarship is currently at an impasse in reconciling the 'Suetonian/Senatorial' depiction of Claudius \"the fool\" and Claudius the progressive legislator, builder, and administrator that modern revisionism has discerned. By analyzing the disability bias that exists in the ancient literary material, this discussion demonstrates that ancient representations of Claudius are significantly distorted by ableist assumptions and disablist prejudice. In recognizing this, we can understand Claudius on a more contextually appropriate level, unencumbered by mutually exclusive depictions.","PeriodicalId":81501,"journal":{"name":"Illinois classical studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"132 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illinois classical studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/23285265.47.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:By utilizing methodological frameworks and techniques employed in Disability Studies and Disability History, this article aims to attenuate the historiographical "problem of Claudius." Scholarship is currently at an impasse in reconciling the 'Suetonian/Senatorial' depiction of Claudius "the fool" and Claudius the progressive legislator, builder, and administrator that modern revisionism has discerned. By analyzing the disability bias that exists in the ancient literary material, this discussion demonstrates that ancient representations of Claudius are significantly distorted by ableist assumptions and disablist prejudice. In recognizing this, we can understand Claudius on a more contextually appropriate level, unencumbered by mutually exclusive depictions.
“克劳狄问题”中的残疾/残疾主义:古文献对克劳狄残疾的接受
摘要:通过利用残疾研究和残疾史中使用的方法论框架和技术,本文旨在削弱历史上的“克劳迪斯问题”。学术界目前在调和对克劳迪斯“傻瓜”和进步立法者、建设者、,以及现代修正主义所发现的管理者。通过分析古代文学材料中存在的残疾偏见,本讨论表明,古代对克劳迪斯的描述被残疾主义假设和残疾主义偏见严重扭曲。认识到这一点,我们可以在一个更适合上下文的层面上理解克劳迪斯,不受相互排斥的描述的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信