{"title":"Nature Of Information Provided And Quality Of Sustainability Reports Assurance Statements Of Fortune Global 500 Companies","authors":"Tarmizi Achmad, F. Faisal, M. B. Ulum","doi":"10.19030/JABR.V33I5.10024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to investigate how the quality of assurance statement varies among the different \nassurance providers (accounting versus non-accounting firms). The sample consists of one hundred thirty-five of \nFortune Global 500 companies for the year 2014. Independent sample t-test is used to determine how the quality of \nassurance statement differs among various assurance providers. \nThe result shows that accounting firms still dominate the sustainability report assurance market (75.56 per cent), \nwhile non-accounting firms is 24.44 per cent. However, in terms of quality score of assurance statement, nonaccounting \nassurance providers (consultant) value higher than accounting firms for all aspects of report content \n(reporting format, assurance procedures and recommendations and opinion). \nThe implication of this finding suggests that the company not only to consider the reputation of the assurance \nprovider, but the more important thing is competence and expertise in the field of sustainability reporting. Despite \nthe growing interest research in assurance, this study is one of the few studies that measure assurance quality by \ncontent analysis.","PeriodicalId":40064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Business Research","volume":"33 1","pages":"1023"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/JABR.V33I5.10024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate how the quality of assurance statement varies among the different
assurance providers (accounting versus non-accounting firms). The sample consists of one hundred thirty-five of
Fortune Global 500 companies for the year 2014. Independent sample t-test is used to determine how the quality of
assurance statement differs among various assurance providers.
The result shows that accounting firms still dominate the sustainability report assurance market (75.56 per cent),
while non-accounting firms is 24.44 per cent. However, in terms of quality score of assurance statement, nonaccounting
assurance providers (consultant) value higher than accounting firms for all aspects of report content
(reporting format, assurance procedures and recommendations and opinion).
The implication of this finding suggests that the company not only to consider the reputation of the assurance
provider, but the more important thing is competence and expertise in the field of sustainability reporting. Despite
the growing interest research in assurance, this study is one of the few studies that measure assurance quality by
content analysis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) welcomes articles in all areas of applied business and economics research. Both theoretical and applied manuscripts will be considered for publication; however, theoretical manuscripts must provide a clear link to important and interesting business and economics applications. Using a wide range of research methods including statistical analysis, analytical work, case studies, field research, and historical analysis, articles examine significant applied business and economics research questions from a broad range of perspectives. The intention of JABR is to publish papers that significantly contribute to these fields.