Direct Instruction vs. Computer Simulation and their Learning Outcome in Engineering Education

IF 0.7 4区 工程技术 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
A. Zendler, Manuel Gohl
{"title":"Direct Instruction vs. Computer Simulation and their Learning Outcome in Engineering Education","authors":"A. Zendler, Manuel Gohl","doi":"10.14710/IJEE.1.2.91-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Answers to the questions of which instructional methods are suitable for school, what instructional methods should be applied in teaching individual subjects and how instructional methods support the act of learning represent challenges to general education and education in individual subjects. This study focuses on the empirical examination of learning outcome in engineering educationwith respect to two instructional methods: direct instruction and computer simulation. A CRF 2x2 design is used to control instructional method and class context. Learning outcome on bridge construction is assessed with reference to the optics of bridge and the material usage for the bridge. The empirical findings show that learning with direct instruction was superior to computer simulation.","PeriodicalId":54960,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"91-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/IJEE.1.2.91-98","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Answers to the questions of which instructional methods are suitable for school, what instructional methods should be applied in teaching individual subjects and how instructional methods support the act of learning represent challenges to general education and education in individual subjects. This study focuses on the empirical examination of learning outcome in engineering educationwith respect to two instructional methods: direct instruction and computer simulation. A CRF 2x2 design is used to control instructional method and class context. Learning outcome on bridge construction is assessed with reference to the optics of bridge and the material usage for the bridge. The empirical findings show that learning with direct instruction was superior to computer simulation.
工程教育中直接教学与计算机模拟及其学习效果
对于哪些教学方法适合学校、在个别科目的教学中应该应用哪些教学方法以及教学方法如何支持学习行为等问题的回答,代表着对普通教育和个别科目教育的挑战。本研究从直接教学法和计算机模拟两种教学方法对工程教育中的学习结果进行实证检验。CRF 2x2设计用于控制教学方法和课堂环境。参考桥梁的光学特性和桥梁的材料使用情况,评估桥梁施工的学习成果。实证结果表明,直接指导学习优于计算机模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Engineering Education
International Journal of Engineering Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
30.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE) is an independent, peer-reviewed journal. It has been serving as an international archival forum of scholarly research related to engineering education for over thirty years. The Journal publishes six issues per year. These include, from time to time, special issues on specific engineering education topics. Only manuscripts that have a focus on engineering education will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信