Shrinking the market space: consumer (overlapping) preferences for organic wines and three alternative competitors

IF 2.3 Q1 AGRONOMY
R. Vecchio, D. Toccaceli, A. Pacciani, C. Cavallo, Gerarda Caso
{"title":"Shrinking the market space: consumer (overlapping) preferences for organic wines and three alternative competitors","authors":"R. Vecchio, D. Toccaceli, A. Pacciani, C. Cavallo, Gerarda Caso","doi":"10.1108/ijwbr-10-2022-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe scenario of clean wines is rather articulated, and many consumers perceive diverse types of wines as a homogeneous category, not actually related with the true characteristics of the products. Additionally, most often, individuals turning to these wines are driven either by health concerns or environmental consciousness or by curiosity. The purpose of this study is to understand whether there are differences in monetary preferences for four distinct clean labels and to analyze the level of interest of diverse market segments of regular wine consumers for this specific category of wines.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study applied a computer-assisted Web interviewing technique. A survey was administrated in mid-September 2021 by a professional panel provider to a quota-based sample (N = 1,113) of Italian regular wine consumers. Individual willingness-to-pay (WTP) for red wines carrying different claims (organic, natural, low-sulfites and no-additives) and a conventional counterpart were collected. Clean wines’ WTP were subsequently used for hierarchical clustering.\n\n\nFindings\nAmong the clean labels presented, respondents reported a higher WTP for organic wine. Cluster analysis yielded three actionable segments: “Easygoing wine enjoyers” (63.7%), “Convenience drinkers” (13.4%) and “Clean wine passionate” (23%). The latter reveals high preferences for all the investigated clean wines.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nSociodemographics and wine-related characteristics of regular wine consumers particularly interested in clean wines are depicted in this study; further analysis should delve on the core drivers of individual preferences.\n\n\nPractical implications\nWineries should consider the heterogeneous interest of regular wine consumers for clean wines, developing tailored strategies for specific market segments. Stakeholders interested in safeguarding consumers should carefully monitor the landscape of different clean claims entering the wine market.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous study has simultaneously analyzed regular wine consumers’ preferences for the four types of clean labels.\n","PeriodicalId":46955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wine Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wine Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwbr-10-2022-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The scenario of clean wines is rather articulated, and many consumers perceive diverse types of wines as a homogeneous category, not actually related with the true characteristics of the products. Additionally, most often, individuals turning to these wines are driven either by health concerns or environmental consciousness or by curiosity. The purpose of this study is to understand whether there are differences in monetary preferences for four distinct clean labels and to analyze the level of interest of diverse market segments of regular wine consumers for this specific category of wines. Design/methodology/approach This study applied a computer-assisted Web interviewing technique. A survey was administrated in mid-September 2021 by a professional panel provider to a quota-based sample (N = 1,113) of Italian regular wine consumers. Individual willingness-to-pay (WTP) for red wines carrying different claims (organic, natural, low-sulfites and no-additives) and a conventional counterpart were collected. Clean wines’ WTP were subsequently used for hierarchical clustering. Findings Among the clean labels presented, respondents reported a higher WTP for organic wine. Cluster analysis yielded three actionable segments: “Easygoing wine enjoyers” (63.7%), “Convenience drinkers” (13.4%) and “Clean wine passionate” (23%). The latter reveals high preferences for all the investigated clean wines. Research limitations/implications Sociodemographics and wine-related characteristics of regular wine consumers particularly interested in clean wines are depicted in this study; further analysis should delve on the core drivers of individual preferences. Practical implications Wineries should consider the heterogeneous interest of regular wine consumers for clean wines, developing tailored strategies for specific market segments. Stakeholders interested in safeguarding consumers should carefully monitor the landscape of different clean claims entering the wine market. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous study has simultaneously analyzed regular wine consumers’ preferences for the four types of clean labels.
缩小市场空间:消费者对有机葡萄酒的偏好(重叠)和三个替代竞争对手
清洁葡萄酒的情况是相当明确的,许多消费者认为不同类型的葡萄酒是同质的类别,实际上与产品的真实特征无关。此外,大多数情况下,人们转向这些葡萄酒要么是出于健康考虑,要么是出于环保意识,要么是出于好奇心。本研究的目的是了解四种不同清洁标签的货币偏好是否存在差异,并分析不同细分市场的普通葡萄酒消费者对这一特定类别葡萄酒的兴趣水平。设计/方法/方法本研究采用计算机辅助网络访谈技术。2021年9月中旬,一家专业小组供应商对意大利普通葡萄酒消费者的配额样本(N = 1113)进行了一项调查。收集了不同声明(有机、天然、低亚硫酸盐和无添加剂)和传统红酒的个人支付意愿(WTP)。清洁葡萄酒的WTP随后被用于分层聚类。在提供的清洁标签中,受访者报告有机葡萄酒的WTP更高。聚类分析得出了三个可操作的细分市场:“随和的葡萄酒爱好者”(63.7%)、“方便的饮酒者”(13.4%)和“清洁的葡萄酒爱好者”(23%)。后者揭示了对所有被调查的干净葡萄酒的高度偏好。研究局限性/启示本研究描述了对清洁葡萄酒特别感兴趣的普通葡萄酒消费者的社会人口统计学和葡萄酒相关特征;进一步的分析应该深入研究个人偏好的核心驱动因素。酒厂应该考虑普通葡萄酒消费者对清洁葡萄酒的不同兴趣,为特定的细分市场制定量身定制的策略。有兴趣保护消费者的利益相关者应仔细监测进入葡萄酒市场的不同清洁声明的情况。原创性/价值据作者所知,之前没有研究同时分析过普通葡萄酒消费者对四种清洁标签的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信