Development and Test of a Decision Aid for Shared Decision Making in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
H. Mainz, L. Frandsen, M. Lind, P. Faunø, K. Lomborg
{"title":"Development and Test of a Decision Aid for Shared Decision Making in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury","authors":"H. Mainz, L. Frandsen, M. Lind, P. Faunø, K. Lomborg","doi":"10.1177/23814683221081434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Patients with anterior crucial ligament injury are faced with a choice between surgery or nonsurgical treatment with intensive rehabilitation. Patients must be involved in the decision making to choose a treatment that meets their individual values, lifestyle, and conditions. The aim of the study was to describe, develop, and evaluate a patient decision aid to support shared decision making. Methods. The development of a patient decision aid was based on international criteria, current literature, and former patients’ experiences and suggestions on how to optimize the decision-making process. The patient decision aid was evaluated by the SDM-Q9 questionnaire and semistructured interviews with patients and doctors. Results. On a scale from 0 to 5, patients experienced a high degree of shared decision making in their treatment decision both before (score 4.3) and after (score 4.3) implementation of the patient decision aid (P = .72). From interviews, patients expressed that they found the patient decision aid very useful. Reflection time was especially important for some patients. Doctors reported that the patient decision aid improved shared decision making by supporting the dialogue clarifying patients’ values concerning issues important for treatment choices. Conclusion. A systematic process involving patients with an anterior crucial ligament injury was successfully used to develop a patient decision aid for treatment options. No statistically significant difference in the SDM-Q9 score was found presumably caused by the ceiling effect. However, patients experienced the decision aid as very useful when making treatment decisions, and doctors reported that it improved the dialogue clarifying patients’ values important for the treatment options. The developing process and patient decision aid can be used as inspiration in similar situations to increase shared decision making in treatment choices. Highlights A patient decision aid for anterior cruciate ligament injured patients was developed based on international criteria, the current literature, and patients’ experiences and suggestions on how to optimize the decision-making process about surgical and nonsurgical treatment. The decision aid improved shared decision making by supporting the dialog between the patient and the doctor to clarify the patients’ values concerning issues important for the treatment options.","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683221081434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background. Patients with anterior crucial ligament injury are faced with a choice between surgery or nonsurgical treatment with intensive rehabilitation. Patients must be involved in the decision making to choose a treatment that meets their individual values, lifestyle, and conditions. The aim of the study was to describe, develop, and evaluate a patient decision aid to support shared decision making. Methods. The development of a patient decision aid was based on international criteria, current literature, and former patients’ experiences and suggestions on how to optimize the decision-making process. The patient decision aid was evaluated by the SDM-Q9 questionnaire and semistructured interviews with patients and doctors. Results. On a scale from 0 to 5, patients experienced a high degree of shared decision making in their treatment decision both before (score 4.3) and after (score 4.3) implementation of the patient decision aid (P = .72). From interviews, patients expressed that they found the patient decision aid very useful. Reflection time was especially important for some patients. Doctors reported that the patient decision aid improved shared decision making by supporting the dialogue clarifying patients’ values concerning issues important for treatment choices. Conclusion. A systematic process involving patients with an anterior crucial ligament injury was successfully used to develop a patient decision aid for treatment options. No statistically significant difference in the SDM-Q9 score was found presumably caused by the ceiling effect. However, patients experienced the decision aid as very useful when making treatment decisions, and doctors reported that it improved the dialogue clarifying patients’ values important for the treatment options. The developing process and patient decision aid can be used as inspiration in similar situations to increase shared decision making in treatment choices. Highlights A patient decision aid for anterior cruciate ligament injured patients was developed based on international criteria, the current literature, and patients’ experiences and suggestions on how to optimize the decision-making process about surgical and nonsurgical treatment. The decision aid improved shared decision making by supporting the dialog between the patient and the doctor to clarify the patients’ values concerning issues important for the treatment options.
用于前交叉韧带损伤患者共同决策的决策辅助工具的开发和测试
背景。前关键韧带损伤患者面临着手术或非手术治疗与强化康复的选择。患者必须参与决策,选择符合其个人价值观、生活方式和病情的治疗方法。本研究的目的是描述、开发和评估一种支持共同决策的患者决策辅助工具。方法。患者决策辅助系统的开发是基于国际标准、当前文献和前患者的经验以及如何优化决策过程的建议。通过SDM-Q9问卷和对患者和医生的半结构化访谈对患者决策辅助进行评估。结果。在从0到5的评分中,患者在实施患者决策辅助之前(得分4.3)和之后(得分4.3)在治疗决策中经历了高度的共同决策(P = 0.72)。从访谈中,患者表示他们发现患者决策辅助非常有用。对一些病人来说,反思时间尤为重要。医生报告说,患者决策援助通过支持对话来澄清患者对治疗选择重要问题的价值观,从而改善了共同决策。结论。一个涉及前关键韧带损伤患者的系统过程成功地用于开发患者决策辅助治疗方案。SDM-Q9评分没有统计学上的显著差异,可能是由天花板效应引起的。然而,患者认为决策辅助在做出治疗决定时非常有用,医生报告说,它改善了对话,澄清了患者对治疗选择的重要价值观。开发过程和患者决策辅助可以作为类似情况下的启发,以增加治疗选择的共同决策。针对前交叉韧带损伤患者的决策辅助系统是基于国际标准、现有文献以及患者的经验和建议来优化手术和非手术治疗的决策过程。决策辅助通过支持患者和医生之间的对话来澄清患者对治疗方案重要问题的价值观,从而改善了共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信