‘The Skills. . . had to be Used Simply Because They Were There’: Instrumental Rationality in the Military Domain

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Yagil Levy
{"title":"‘The Skills. . . had to be Used Simply Because They Were There’: Instrumental Rationality in the Military Domain","authors":"Yagil Levy","doi":"10.1177/03058298231185965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is conceptually motivated to show how instrumental rationality is reflected in the military domain. Instrumental rationality refers to the adoption of suitable means to achieve particular ends. However, this conception was criticised by the Frankfurt School for focusing on means rather than on ends. Based on this critique, I present specific categories of instrumental rationality in the military domain. I will argue that instrumental rationality, or at least its faulty application, is reflected in means-centred thinking whereby the means justify the ends. This approach may create specific categories in the military domain: means justify the ends just because they are available, and they can also expand the ends. The means-centred approach may be expanded from subordinating ends to means to focusing on the objects to be attacked, thus developing an objects-centred approach that may also develop into a focus on the direct outcome of the operation of means, thus becoming a tool of legitimation. A similar legitimising impact is produced by the process of moralisation implicit in the focus on means. Finally, a means-centred approach may be translated into overconfidence in the omnipotence of means, and can thereby be elevated to the belief that weapons can obviate the need for political settlement. « Ces compétences. . . devaient être utilisées simplement parce qu’elles étaient là » : La rationalité instrumentale dans le domaine militaire","PeriodicalId":18593,"journal":{"name":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298231185965","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is conceptually motivated to show how instrumental rationality is reflected in the military domain. Instrumental rationality refers to the adoption of suitable means to achieve particular ends. However, this conception was criticised by the Frankfurt School for focusing on means rather than on ends. Based on this critique, I present specific categories of instrumental rationality in the military domain. I will argue that instrumental rationality, or at least its faulty application, is reflected in means-centred thinking whereby the means justify the ends. This approach may create specific categories in the military domain: means justify the ends just because they are available, and they can also expand the ends. The means-centred approach may be expanded from subordinating ends to means to focusing on the objects to be attacked, thus developing an objects-centred approach that may also develop into a focus on the direct outcome of the operation of means, thus becoming a tool of legitimation. A similar legitimising impact is produced by the process of moralisation implicit in the focus on means. Finally, a means-centred approach may be translated into overconfidence in the omnipotence of means, and can thereby be elevated to the belief that weapons can obviate the need for political settlement. « Ces compétences. . . devaient être utilisées simplement parce qu’elles étaient là » : La rationalité instrumentale dans le domaine militaire
“技能。必须简单地使用,因为它们在那里”:军事领域的工具理性
本文的概念动机是展示工具理性如何反映在军事领域。工具理性是指采用合适的手段来达到特定的目的。然而,这一概念受到法兰克福学派的批评,因为它关注的是手段而不是目的。基于这一批判,我提出了军事领域工具理性的具体类别。我将论证,工具理性,或者至少是它的错误应用,反映在以手段为中心的思维中,即以手段为目的辩护。这种方法可能会在军事领域产生特定的类别:手段证明目的是正当的,因为它们是可用的,它们也可以扩展目的。以手段为中心的方法可以从把目的从属于手段扩展到关注被攻击的对象,从而发展出一种以对象为中心的方法,这种方法也可以发展为关注手段运作的直接结果,从而成为一种合法化的工具。对手段的关注中隐含的道德化过程也产生了类似的合法化影响。最后,以手段为中心的做法可能会转化为对手段万能的过分自信,从而可以上升为相信武器可以消除政治解决的需要。“这两个公司……不正常的être利用电子渡假假的渡假假的渡假假的渡假假的渡假假
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信