{"title":"Collective creativity in management science","authors":"Damian Ciachorowski, A. M. Lis","doi":"10.2478/emj-2022-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper aims to establish the current state of knowledge on collective creativity in management science based on a systematic literature review. A systematic review was performed based on the three-step SPL procedure proposed by Tranfield et al. (2003). Two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) were searched electronically until March 2022. Literature analysis and content analysis were performed based on the secondary data. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria following the systematic literature review procedure. The conducted descriptive and thematic analysis allowed establishing the state of knowledge in the analysed area and identifying the main thematic areas along with the future research directions. The research was the first to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on collective creativity in management science. The main contribution of this paper is its exclusive focus on analysing existing research in the collective creativity field, limited to management science. SLR allowed determining that research in the analysed area was still at a fairly early stage. Although the existing literature sheds some light on collective creativity, studies investigating the aspects of teamwork focused on problem-solving are required.","PeriodicalId":37237,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Management in Production and Services","volume":"14 1","pages":"68 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Management in Production and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2022-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract This paper aims to establish the current state of knowledge on collective creativity in management science based on a systematic literature review. A systematic review was performed based on the three-step SPL procedure proposed by Tranfield et al. (2003). Two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) were searched electronically until March 2022. Literature analysis and content analysis were performed based on the secondary data. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria following the systematic literature review procedure. The conducted descriptive and thematic analysis allowed establishing the state of knowledge in the analysed area and identifying the main thematic areas along with the future research directions. The research was the first to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on collective creativity in management science. The main contribution of this paper is its exclusive focus on analysing existing research in the collective creativity field, limited to management science. SLR allowed determining that research in the analysed area was still at a fairly early stage. Although the existing literature sheds some light on collective creativity, studies investigating the aspects of teamwork focused on problem-solving are required.
摘要本文旨在通过系统的文献综述,建立管理科学中关于集体创造力的知识现状。根据Tranfield等人(2003)提出的三步SPL程序进行了系统回顾。两个数据库(Scopus和Web of Science)的电子检索截止到2022年3月。根据二次资料进行文献分析和内容分析。根据系统文献回顾程序,18项研究符合纳入标准。所进行的描述性和专题分析可以建立所分析领域的知识状况,并确定主要的专题领域以及未来的研究方向。该研究首次对管理科学中的集体创造力进行了系统的文献综述(SLR)。本文的主要贡献在于其对集体创造力领域的现有研究的分析,仅限于管理科学。单反允许确定在分析领域的研究仍处于相当早期的阶段。虽然现有的文献揭示了一些关于集体创造力,但研究团队合作的各个方面,重点是解决问题是必要的。