Collective creativity in management science

Q2 Engineering
Damian Ciachorowski, A. M. Lis
{"title":"Collective creativity in management science","authors":"Damian Ciachorowski, A. M. Lis","doi":"10.2478/emj-2022-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper aims to establish the current state of knowledge on collective creativity in management science based on a systematic literature review. A systematic review was performed based on the three-step SPL procedure proposed by Tranfield et al. (2003). Two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) were searched electronically until March 2022. Literature analysis and content analysis were performed based on the secondary data. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria following the systematic literature review procedure. The conducted descriptive and thematic analysis allowed establishing the state of knowledge in the analysed area and identifying the main thematic areas along with the future research directions. The research was the first to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on collective creativity in management science. The main contribution of this paper is its exclusive focus on analysing existing research in the collective creativity field, limited to management science. SLR allowed determining that research in the analysed area was still at a fairly early stage. Although the existing literature sheds some light on collective creativity, studies investigating the aspects of teamwork focused on problem-solving are required.","PeriodicalId":37237,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Management in Production and Services","volume":"14 1","pages":"68 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Management in Production and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2022-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to establish the current state of knowledge on collective creativity in management science based on a systematic literature review. A systematic review was performed based on the three-step SPL procedure proposed by Tranfield et al. (2003). Two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) were searched electronically until March 2022. Literature analysis and content analysis were performed based on the secondary data. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria following the systematic literature review procedure. The conducted descriptive and thematic analysis allowed establishing the state of knowledge in the analysed area and identifying the main thematic areas along with the future research directions. The research was the first to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on collective creativity in management science. The main contribution of this paper is its exclusive focus on analysing existing research in the collective creativity field, limited to management science. SLR allowed determining that research in the analysed area was still at a fairly early stage. Although the existing literature sheds some light on collective creativity, studies investigating the aspects of teamwork focused on problem-solving are required.
管理科学中的集体创新
摘要本文旨在通过系统的文献综述,建立管理科学中关于集体创造力的知识现状。根据Tranfield等人(2003)提出的三步SPL程序进行了系统回顾。两个数据库(Scopus和Web of Science)的电子检索截止到2022年3月。根据二次资料进行文献分析和内容分析。根据系统文献回顾程序,18项研究符合纳入标准。所进行的描述性和专题分析可以建立所分析领域的知识状况,并确定主要的专题领域以及未来的研究方向。该研究首次对管理科学中的集体创造力进行了系统的文献综述(SLR)。本文的主要贡献在于其对集体创造力领域的现有研究的分析,仅限于管理科学。单反允许确定在分析领域的研究仍处于相当早期的阶段。虽然现有的文献揭示了一些关于集体创造力,但研究团队合作的各个方面,重点是解决问题是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Management in Production and Services
Engineering Management in Production and Services Business, Management and Accounting-Management Information Systems
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信