The Buddhist factor in Oirat legislation

B. Kitinov
{"title":"The Buddhist factor in Oirat legislation","authors":"B. Kitinov","doi":"10.22363/2312-8127-2020-12-2-169-185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legislative acts, adopted by the Oirad in the middle of the XVII - the middle of the XVIII centuries, proceeded from the real external and internal political situation, depended on the influence of religious and social conditions. Laws of 1640 should be recognized as the most universally recognized and authoritative ones, since they were supposed to strengthen the relations of the Oirad with the Eastern Mongols, the unity (mutual assistance and interaction) of the Oirad in the conditions of the collapse of their former (Middle) Confederation. But it was precisely the consequences of the disintegration that necessitated the development of new, more local versions of laws, that have been adopted in Jungar (Decrees of Galdan Boshogtu-khan), Qoshut (Mongolian code of Gushi-khan, Basic code of Kukunor chuulgan), and later in Kalmyk (Togtol) khanates. Despite the fact that the Buddhist factor is reflected in pointed legislative acts quite clearly, religion is represented on a larger scale especially in Qoshut ones, which should be explained by the proximity of Tibetan sacred authorities to Qoshut people (Kukunor region) and the role of Qoshut kings (rgyal po). Togtol laws, adopted by the Kalmyk ruler Donduk-Dashi, also supplemented Laws of 1640, and marked the formation of a special community grouped around certain sacred texts.","PeriodicalId":34723,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of World History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of World History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2020-12-2-169-185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The legislative acts, adopted by the Oirad in the middle of the XVII - the middle of the XVIII centuries, proceeded from the real external and internal political situation, depended on the influence of religious and social conditions. Laws of 1640 should be recognized as the most universally recognized and authoritative ones, since they were supposed to strengthen the relations of the Oirad with the Eastern Mongols, the unity (mutual assistance and interaction) of the Oirad in the conditions of the collapse of their former (Middle) Confederation. But it was precisely the consequences of the disintegration that necessitated the development of new, more local versions of laws, that have been adopted in Jungar (Decrees of Galdan Boshogtu-khan), Qoshut (Mongolian code of Gushi-khan, Basic code of Kukunor chuulgan), and later in Kalmyk (Togtol) khanates. Despite the fact that the Buddhist factor is reflected in pointed legislative acts quite clearly, religion is represented on a larger scale especially in Qoshut ones, which should be explained by the proximity of Tibetan sacred authorities to Qoshut people (Kukunor region) and the role of Qoshut kings (rgyal po). Togtol laws, adopted by the Kalmyk ruler Donduk-Dashi, also supplemented Laws of 1640, and marked the formation of a special community grouped around certain sacred texts.
印度立法中的佛教因素
17世纪中期至18世纪中期,俄国民议会通过的立法是从真实的内外政治形势出发的,取决于宗教和社会条件的影响。1640年的法律应该被公认为最普遍认可和最权威的法律,因为它们应该加强奥伊拉德与东蒙古的关系,在前(中)邦联崩溃的情况下加强奥伊拉德邦的团结(互助和互动)。但正是由于解体的后果,才有必要制定新的、更具地方性的法律版本,这些版本已在准格尔(加尔丹-博绍格图汗国法令)、库舒特(固始汗国的蒙古法典、库库诺-楚尔干基本法典)和后来的卡尔梅克(托克托尔)汗国获得通过。尽管佛教因素在有针对性的立法中得到了明确的反映,但宗教在更大范围内得到了代表,尤其是在Qoshut地区,这应该通过西藏神圣当局与Qoshut人(Kukunor地区)的接近以及Qoshut国王(rgyal po)的作用来解释。卡尔梅克统治者Donduk Dashi通过的Togtol法律也补充了1640年的法律,并标志着围绕某些神圣文本的特殊群体的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信