Data, Maps, Networks – Digital Approaches to Reading (in) Nineteenth-Century Literature

Regina Schober
{"title":"Data, Maps, Networks – Digital Approaches to Reading (in) Nineteenth-Century Literature","authors":"Regina Schober","doi":"10.18422/71-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, there has been a growing number of scholarly attempts to ‘read’ the 19th century either through digital methods or, more specifically as a precursor to contemporary digital culture. The practice of reading is a category through which the two dimensions of spending time in and with the nineteenth century can be thought together. A focus on reading, as a way to spend time in/with the nineteenth century makes us aware of both the knowledge systems and methodologies of accessing and processing information, both in literary texts of that period and simultaneously in our own work. More specifically, my essay is interested in questions of ‘readability’ and the ‘crisis of reading’, as self-reflexively pronounced in two nineteenth century novels: Herman Melville’s Moby Dick and Frank Norris’s The Octopus. These novels, I argue, prefigure debates that are well-known to us and that materialize in the opposition between what Katherine Hayles has called “hyperreading” vs linear or immersive reading, between the New Critic’s formulation of close reading and what Franco Moretti has provocatively called “distant reading”, or the postcritical distinction between symptomatic and surface reading. By discussing different strategies of reading, the novels express the uncontrollability in view of increasing information environments. Yet, even if these webs of signification are elusive and at times dangerous, both novels, in a self-reflexive move, express a desire of writing the human reader into this web of signification and therefore to emphasize the significance of reading in an increasingly automated world.","PeriodicalId":30064,"journal":{"name":"American Studies Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18422/71-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, there has been a growing number of scholarly attempts to ‘read’ the 19th century either through digital methods or, more specifically as a precursor to contemporary digital culture. The practice of reading is a category through which the two dimensions of spending time in and with the nineteenth century can be thought together. A focus on reading, as a way to spend time in/with the nineteenth century makes us aware of both the knowledge systems and methodologies of accessing and processing information, both in literary texts of that period and simultaneously in our own work. More specifically, my essay is interested in questions of ‘readability’ and the ‘crisis of reading’, as self-reflexively pronounced in two nineteenth century novels: Herman Melville’s Moby Dick and Frank Norris’s The Octopus. These novels, I argue, prefigure debates that are well-known to us and that materialize in the opposition between what Katherine Hayles has called “hyperreading” vs linear or immersive reading, between the New Critic’s formulation of close reading and what Franco Moretti has provocatively called “distant reading”, or the postcritical distinction between symptomatic and surface reading. By discussing different strategies of reading, the novels express the uncontrollability in view of increasing information environments. Yet, even if these webs of signification are elusive and at times dangerous, both novels, in a self-reflexive move, express a desire of writing the human reader into this web of signification and therefore to emphasize the significance of reading in an increasingly automated world.
数据,地图,网络-阅读(在)十九世纪文学的数字方法
最近,越来越多的学者试图通过数字方法“阅读”19世纪,或者更具体地说,将其作为当代数字文化的先驱。阅读实践是一个范畴,通过它可以将在19世纪和与19世纪相处的两个维度结合起来思考。专注于阅读,作为一种与19世纪相处的方式,使我们意识到获取和处理信息的知识体系和方法,无论是在那个时期的文学文本中,还是在我们自己的作品中。更具体地说,我的文章对“可读性”和“阅读危机”的问题感兴趣,这在两部19世纪的小说中都有自我反射的表现:赫尔曼·梅尔维尔的《白鲸》和弗兰克·诺里斯的《章鱼》。我认为,这些小说预示着我们所熟知的辩论,这些辩论体现在凯瑟琳·海尔斯所说的“超阅读”与线性或沉浸式阅读之间的对立,新评论家对近距离阅读的表述与弗兰科·莫雷蒂所挑衅性地称之为“远距离阅读”之间的对立中,或者症状阅读和表面阅读之间的后批判性区别中。通过讨论不同的阅读策略,小说表达了在日益增长的信息环境下的不可控制性。然而,即使这些意义网是难以捉摸的,有时是危险的,这两部小说都以自我反射的方式表达了将人类读者写进意义网的愿望,从而强调在一个日益自动化的世界中阅读的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信