Faded Ink: The Material Trace of Handwriting in Neo-Victorian Fiction

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
K. Brindle
{"title":"Faded Ink: The Material Trace of Handwriting in Neo-Victorian Fiction","authors":"K. Brindle","doi":"10.3366/vic.2019.0352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neo-Victorian novelists reimagine handwritten documents to feed contemporary nostalgia for the materiality of handwriting. Handwriting signifies the personal and the private in ways that seem threatened in a digital age. Writers like Andrea Barrett, A. S. Byatt, and Peter Carey map material pathways to the nineteenth century with fictional characters who strive to possess the written past. Archival fantasies are simulated by novelists depicting writing processes and subsequent discovery and rereading of the handwritten trace by later generations. Imagined scenes of reading and writing describe tactile traces of handwriting that stage possession of the Victorian body in fragmented and partially recoverable states. Resurrection of the desired Victorian body through a metonymical relationship of hand/handwriting evokes a sense of a partial past recovered and experienced. Part of the aestheticism of the past relies on the aura of documents worn to a trace to evidence time and decay. Discovering the handwritten trace in this way becomes a sensory experience for readers and descriptions of decayed materiality emphasise survival for imagined fragments. Contemporary writing thus reveals a dual purpose to aestheticise the material past whilst demonstrating a postmodern drive to refute closure and ultimately celebrate the indeterminate facets of the handwritten trace.","PeriodicalId":40670,"journal":{"name":"Victoriographies-A Journal of Nineteenth-Century Writing 1790-1914","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victoriographies-A Journal of Nineteenth-Century Writing 1790-1914","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/vic.2019.0352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neo-Victorian novelists reimagine handwritten documents to feed contemporary nostalgia for the materiality of handwriting. Handwriting signifies the personal and the private in ways that seem threatened in a digital age. Writers like Andrea Barrett, A. S. Byatt, and Peter Carey map material pathways to the nineteenth century with fictional characters who strive to possess the written past. Archival fantasies are simulated by novelists depicting writing processes and subsequent discovery and rereading of the handwritten trace by later generations. Imagined scenes of reading and writing describe tactile traces of handwriting that stage possession of the Victorian body in fragmented and partially recoverable states. Resurrection of the desired Victorian body through a metonymical relationship of hand/handwriting evokes a sense of a partial past recovered and experienced. Part of the aestheticism of the past relies on the aura of documents worn to a trace to evidence time and decay. Discovering the handwritten trace in this way becomes a sensory experience for readers and descriptions of decayed materiality emphasise survival for imagined fragments. Contemporary writing thus reveals a dual purpose to aestheticise the material past whilst demonstrating a postmodern drive to refute closure and ultimately celebrate the indeterminate facets of the handwritten trace.
褪色的墨水:新维多利亚小说中书写的物质痕迹
新维多利亚时代的小说家重新构想手写文件,以满足当代人对手写物质性的怀念。手写以数字时代似乎受到威胁的方式象征着个人和私人。安德里亚·巴雷特(Andrea Barrett)、A.S.拜亚特(A.S.Byatt)和彼得·凯里(Peter Carey。档案幻想是由小说家模拟的,他们描绘了写作过程以及后来后人对手写痕迹的发现和重读。想象中的阅读和写作场景描述了书写的触觉痕迹,这些痕迹将维多利亚时代的身体呈现为支离破碎和部分可恢复的状态。通过手/笔迹的转喻关系,对想要的维多利亚时代身体的复活唤起了一种恢复和体验的部分过去的感觉。过去的部分唯美主义依赖于文件的光环,这些文件被磨损到了时间和腐朽的痕迹。以这种方式发现手写痕迹对读者来说是一种感官体验,对腐朽物质的描述强调了想象碎片的生存。因此,当代写作揭示了一种双重目的,即审美化过去的物质,同时展示了一种后现代主义的动力,以反驳结束语,并最终庆祝手写痕迹的不确定方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信