Radiation exposure by medical X-ray applications

Q1 Medicine
B. Buchberger, Katharina Scholl, Laura Krabbe, L. Spiller, Beate Lux
{"title":"Radiation exposure by medical X-ray applications","authors":"B. Buchberger, Katharina Scholl, Laura Krabbe, L. Spiller, Beate Lux","doi":"10.3205/000308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radioactive material and ionising radiation play a central role in medical diagnostics and therapy. The benefit of ionising radiation is opposed by the risk of irreparable damage of the human organism. This risk, especially for developing malign neoplasms, has particularly been investigated in the population surviving the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but also increasingly in persons with occupational or medical exposure to ionising radiation. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for publications in English and German in relevant databases in March 2016. Retrievals were screened by two independent reviewers. We included examinations using imaging procedures with ionising radiation. The assessment of methodological quality was done concerning representativeness, risk of bias, and further limitations, and reporting quality was assessed using the RECORD checklist. Results: The systematic searches identified seven cross-sectional, one register, and four cohort studies. An increase in collective effective doses analogue to the increase of computed tomography (CT) examinations could be observed. An increased risk of brain tumours in children after exposition to head CT and by an increase of the number of examinations was shown. For children with predisposing factors, an increased risk of tumours of the central nerve system, leukemia, and lymphoma was found. Furthermore, a general risk for malign neoplasms or haemoblastoma, and a specific risk for lymphoma after CT examinations of different parts of the body could be observed. Discussion: Taking into consideration a mostly unclear representativeness of studies and an unclear or high risk of bias as well as lack of comparability due to different research questions, the validity of results is limited. Conclusion: The risk of bias due to a large number of reference sources must be reduced in studies leading to realistic estimates of collective radiation doses. The risk of CT-induced radiation exposure for children should be investigated by further studies with a follow-up of at least ten years.","PeriodicalId":39243,"journal":{"name":"GMS German Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS German Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/000308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Radioactive material and ionising radiation play a central role in medical diagnostics and therapy. The benefit of ionising radiation is opposed by the risk of irreparable damage of the human organism. This risk, especially for developing malign neoplasms, has particularly been investigated in the population surviving the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but also increasingly in persons with occupational or medical exposure to ionising radiation. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for publications in English and German in relevant databases in March 2016. Retrievals were screened by two independent reviewers. We included examinations using imaging procedures with ionising radiation. The assessment of methodological quality was done concerning representativeness, risk of bias, and further limitations, and reporting quality was assessed using the RECORD checklist. Results: The systematic searches identified seven cross-sectional, one register, and four cohort studies. An increase in collective effective doses analogue to the increase of computed tomography (CT) examinations could be observed. An increased risk of brain tumours in children after exposition to head CT and by an increase of the number of examinations was shown. For children with predisposing factors, an increased risk of tumours of the central nerve system, leukemia, and lymphoma was found. Furthermore, a general risk for malign neoplasms or haemoblastoma, and a specific risk for lymphoma after CT examinations of different parts of the body could be observed. Discussion: Taking into consideration a mostly unclear representativeness of studies and an unclear or high risk of bias as well as lack of comparability due to different research questions, the validity of results is limited. Conclusion: The risk of bias due to a large number of reference sources must be reduced in studies leading to realistic estimates of collective radiation doses. The risk of CT-induced radiation exposure for children should be investigated by further studies with a follow-up of at least ten years.
医疗x射线应用的辐射暴露
背景:放射性物质和电离辐射在医学诊断和治疗中发挥着核心作用。电离辐射的好处与对人体有机体造成无法弥补的损害的危险相反。这种风险,特别是发生恶性肿瘤的风险,已在广岛和长崎原子弹爆炸幸存者中进行了特别调查,但也越来越多地在职业或医疗上接触电离辐射的人群中进行了调查。方法:我们于2016年3月在相关数据库中系统检索英文和德文出版物。检索结果由两名独立审稿人进行筛选。我们纳入了使用电离辐射成像程序的检查。方法学质量评估涉及代表性、偏倚风险和进一步局限性,报告质量评估使用RECORD检查表。结果:系统检索确定了7项横断面研究、1项登记研究和4项队列研究。可以观察到集体有效剂量的增加类似于计算机断层扫描(CT)检查的增加。儿童在接受头部CT检查和检查次数增加后患脑肿瘤的风险增加。对于有易感因素的儿童,发现患中枢神经系统肿瘤、白血病和淋巴瘤的风险增加。此外,在身体不同部位的CT检查后,可以观察到恶性肿瘤或造血细胞瘤的一般风险,以及淋巴瘤的特定风险。讨论:考虑到研究的代表性大多不明确,偏倚风险不明确或较高,以及由于研究问题不同而缺乏可比性,结果的有效性受到限制。结论:在对集体辐射剂量进行现实估计的研究中,必须降低大量参考源导致的偏倚风险。ct诱发的儿童辐射暴露的风险应通过至少10年的随访进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS German Medical Science
GMS German Medical Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信