Invisibility by Design: Women and Labor in Japan's Digital Economy by Gabriella Lukács (review)

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
N. Gagné
{"title":"Invisibility by Design: Women and Labor in Japan's Digital Economy by Gabriella Lukács (review)","authors":"N. Gagné","doi":"10.1353/mni.2022.0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the general assumption of a reactive Japan only gradually adopting an active diplomacy and policy approach to regional strategic and security issues even as security challenges increased from the second half of the 1990s. Midford argues that RSM also helped Japan achieve secondary goals. One was to “develop new security utilities not adequately provided by the US-Japan alliance . . . especially in nontraditional security areas such as counterpiracy, counterterrorism, and Humanitarian and Disaster Relief” (p. 4). This is correct, and I found Midford’s framing of these activities helpful. I would have appreciated greater discussion of the strategic significance for Japan, however. Furthermore, Midford identifies the East Asia Maritime Forum under the Democratic Party of Japan as another RSM mechanism and ascribes it importance in the final chapter (p. 163), but discussion of its practical achievements is missing. Midford states that another secondary goal for Tokyo was “to ameliorate new concerns about US abandonment that emerged after the Cold War, as well as its longerterm fear of entrapment by its superpower ally” (p. 4). He argues that it did so by enhancing incentives for engagement, mitigating American “unilateralist tendencies” (p. 22), and providing an avenue for reducing conflict in the face of allied abandonment. The book provides insufficient evidence for RSM having this effect, however, and does not convincingly demonstrate that Tokyo found self-assurance through RSM as opposed to other strategic regional initiatives pursued over the preceding three decades. Nevertheless, in Overcoming Isolationism, Midford provides a valuable service in situating RSM as a crucial vehicle for initiating and facilitating Japan’s engagement with the wider region over this period. Most Japan experts recognize that Tokyo has been a more proactive regional security actor in the new millennium, but Midford essentially argues that Japan began enhancing its ability to drive security cooperation and shape regional outcomes prior to the new millennium through RSM.","PeriodicalId":54069,"journal":{"name":"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA","volume":"77 1","pages":"388 - 394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mni.2022.0067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

the general assumption of a reactive Japan only gradually adopting an active diplomacy and policy approach to regional strategic and security issues even as security challenges increased from the second half of the 1990s. Midford argues that RSM also helped Japan achieve secondary goals. One was to “develop new security utilities not adequately provided by the US-Japan alliance . . . especially in nontraditional security areas such as counterpiracy, counterterrorism, and Humanitarian and Disaster Relief” (p. 4). This is correct, and I found Midford’s framing of these activities helpful. I would have appreciated greater discussion of the strategic significance for Japan, however. Furthermore, Midford identifies the East Asia Maritime Forum under the Democratic Party of Japan as another RSM mechanism and ascribes it importance in the final chapter (p. 163), but discussion of its practical achievements is missing. Midford states that another secondary goal for Tokyo was “to ameliorate new concerns about US abandonment that emerged after the Cold War, as well as its longerterm fear of entrapment by its superpower ally” (p. 4). He argues that it did so by enhancing incentives for engagement, mitigating American “unilateralist tendencies” (p. 22), and providing an avenue for reducing conflict in the face of allied abandonment. The book provides insufficient evidence for RSM having this effect, however, and does not convincingly demonstrate that Tokyo found self-assurance through RSM as opposed to other strategic regional initiatives pursued over the preceding three decades. Nevertheless, in Overcoming Isolationism, Midford provides a valuable service in situating RSM as a crucial vehicle for initiating and facilitating Japan’s engagement with the wider region over this period. Most Japan experts recognize that Tokyo has been a more proactive regional security actor in the new millennium, but Midford essentially argues that Japan began enhancing its ability to drive security cooperation and shape regional outcomes prior to the new millennium through RSM.
Gabriella Lukács的《设计的隐形:日本数字经济中的女性与劳工》(综述)
尽管自20世纪90年代后半期以来安全挑战不断增加,但日本反应迟钝的普遍假设只是逐渐对区域战略和安全问题采取积极的外交和政策方针。Midford认为RSM也帮助日本实现了次要目标。一个是“开发美日联盟没有充分提供的新安全设施……特别是在反海盗、反恐、人道主义和救灾等非传统安全领域”(第4页)。这是正确的,我发现Midford对这些活动的框架很有帮助。不过,我本希望更多地讨论对日本的战略意义。此外,Midford将日本民主党领导下的东亚海事论坛确定为另一个RSM机制,并在最后一章(第163页)中给予了重视,但对其实际成就的讨论却缺失了。Midford表示,东京的另一个次要目标是“缓解冷战后出现的对美国放弃的新担忧,以及对其超级大国盟友诱捕的长期担忧”(第4页)。他认为,这是通过加强参与的激励措施,缓解美国的“单边主义倾向”(第22页),并为在盟国放弃的情况下减少冲突提供了途径。然而,这本书没有为RSM产生这种影响提供足够的证据,也没有令人信服地证明东京通过RSM找到了自我保证,而不是在过去三十年中推行的其他战略性区域举措。尽管如此,在克服孤立主义方面,Midford提供了宝贵的服务,将RSM定位为在此期间启动和促进日本与更广泛地区接触的关键工具。大多数日本专家都认识到,东京在新千年中是一个更加积极主动的地区安全行动者,但Midford基本上认为,日本在新千年间开始通过RSM提高其推动安全合作和塑造地区成果的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MONUMENTA NIPPONICA
MONUMENTA NIPPONICA ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Monumenta Nipponica was founded in 1938 by Sophia University, Tokyo, to provide a common platform for scholars throughout the world to present their research on Japanese culture, history, literature, and society. One of the oldest and most highly regarded English-language journals in the Asian studies field, it is known not only for articles of original scholarship and timely book reviews, but also for authoritative translations of a wide range of Japanese historical and literary sources. Previously published four times a year, since 2008 the journal has appeared semiannually, in May and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信