{"title":"Safety of yellow fever vaccine strain (Tiantan strain) in China and WHO vaccine strain 17D-213","authors":"Ling Wang, Na Li, Enyue Fang, Y. Yin, Yuhua Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5101.2019.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo study the intracerebral pathogenicity of the yellow fever vaccine strains of Tiantan strain used in China and WHO vaccine strain 17D-213 in mice. \n \n \nMethods \nMice of different ages and strains were intracerebrally injected with same amount of Tiantan strain and 17D-213 strain. The death and survival of mice were observed and recorded. The LD50/ml and half survival time of the two vaccine strains were compared and analyzed. \n \n \nResults \nThere was no difference in LD50/ml between the Tiantan strain and 17D-213 strain when used through intracerebral injection in one-day-old suckling mice, 7-9 g mice or 12-14 g mice. Moreover, no significant difference in survival trend was found in 7-9 g mice or 12-14 g mice injected with the two vaccine strains. However, the two strains had statistically different influences on the survival trend of one-day-old suckling mice. The half survival time of the Tiantan strain was 11 d, while that of the WHO vaccine strain 17D-213 was 6 d. Excepting in NIH mice, no significant differences in LD50/ml were detected between the same amount of two strains in BALB/c, KM, ICR or C57 mice. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe yellow fever Tiantan vaccine strain and WHO vaccine strain 17D-213 have no significant difference in the intracerebral pathogenicity in mice of different ages and strains with good safety. \n \n \nKey words: \nYellow fever; Vaccine strain; Intracerebral pathogenicity; Safety","PeriodicalId":10089,"journal":{"name":"中华微生物学和免疫学杂志","volume":"39 1","pages":"657-661"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华微生物学和免疫学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5101.2019.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To study the intracerebral pathogenicity of the yellow fever vaccine strains of Tiantan strain used in China and WHO vaccine strain 17D-213 in mice.
Methods
Mice of different ages and strains were intracerebrally injected with same amount of Tiantan strain and 17D-213 strain. The death and survival of mice were observed and recorded. The LD50/ml and half survival time of the two vaccine strains were compared and analyzed.
Results
There was no difference in LD50/ml between the Tiantan strain and 17D-213 strain when used through intracerebral injection in one-day-old suckling mice, 7-9 g mice or 12-14 g mice. Moreover, no significant difference in survival trend was found in 7-9 g mice or 12-14 g mice injected with the two vaccine strains. However, the two strains had statistically different influences on the survival trend of one-day-old suckling mice. The half survival time of the Tiantan strain was 11 d, while that of the WHO vaccine strain 17D-213 was 6 d. Excepting in NIH mice, no significant differences in LD50/ml were detected between the same amount of two strains in BALB/c, KM, ICR or C57 mice.
Conclusions
The yellow fever Tiantan vaccine strain and WHO vaccine strain 17D-213 have no significant difference in the intracerebral pathogenicity in mice of different ages and strains with good safety.
Key words:
Yellow fever; Vaccine strain; Intracerebral pathogenicity; Safety
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology established in 1981. It is one of the series of journal sponsored by Chinese Medical Association. The aim of this journal is to spread and exchange the scientific achievements and practical experience in order to promote the development of medical microbiology and immunology. Its main contents comprise academic thesis, brief reports, reviews, summaries, news of meetings, book reviews and trends of home and abroad in this field. The distinguishing feature of the journal is to give the priority to the reports on the research of basic theory, and take account of the reports on clinical and practical skills.