{"title":"Study On Device System to Reduce Tracheal Mucosal Injury in Intubation Patients","authors":"Dai Won Suh, Seung Bong Lee, Sung Min Kim","doi":"10.1115/1.4054334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The purpose of this study was to develop an automatic bronchial aspiration system to minimize tracheal mucosal damage in ventilator patients. Operation performances of the system's suction pressure, bronchial intubation depth, suction cycle, and tube cuff pressure were tested. To check clinical results, subjects underwent endoscopy after applying the previous manual method for 24 hours. After that, they underwent endoscopy after applying the proposed suction system for 24 hours. For quantitative evaluation of test results, tracheal mucosal injury was divided into five grades: Grade 0 = normal, Grade 1 = erythema or edema, Grade 2 = erosion, Grade 3 = hemorrhage, and Grade 4 = ulcer or necrosis. In the performance test, an error of up to 12 mmHg occurred within the normal operation error range for suction pressure control. The insertion depth control had a maximum error of 7.0 mm within the normal operation error range. On the other hand, there was no error in the time control or the tube cuff pressure control. In the clinical trial, after using the proposed system for five subjects to find changes in tracheal mucosal injury by endoscopy, reduced injury or no change in injury was found. The system proposed in this study is confirmed to be able to remove sputum while minimizing tracheal mucosal injury that can occur when using previous manual suction device.","PeriodicalId":49305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Devices-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Devices-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop an automatic bronchial aspiration system to minimize tracheal mucosal damage in ventilator patients. Operation performances of the system's suction pressure, bronchial intubation depth, suction cycle, and tube cuff pressure were tested. To check clinical results, subjects underwent endoscopy after applying the previous manual method for 24 hours. After that, they underwent endoscopy after applying the proposed suction system for 24 hours. For quantitative evaluation of test results, tracheal mucosal injury was divided into five grades: Grade 0 = normal, Grade 1 = erythema or edema, Grade 2 = erosion, Grade 3 = hemorrhage, and Grade 4 = ulcer or necrosis. In the performance test, an error of up to 12 mmHg occurred within the normal operation error range for suction pressure control. The insertion depth control had a maximum error of 7.0 mm within the normal operation error range. On the other hand, there was no error in the time control or the tube cuff pressure control. In the clinical trial, after using the proposed system for five subjects to find changes in tracheal mucosal injury by endoscopy, reduced injury or no change in injury was found. The system proposed in this study is confirmed to be able to remove sputum while minimizing tracheal mucosal injury that can occur when using previous manual suction device.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medical Devices presents papers on medical devices that improve diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic treatments focusing on applied research and the development of new medical devices or instrumentation. It provides special coverage of novel devices that allow new surgical strategies, new methods of drug delivery, or possible reductions in the complexity, cost, or adverse results of health care. The Design Innovation category features papers focusing on novel devices, including papers with limited clinical or engineering results. The Medical Device News section provides coverage of advances, trends, and events.