Revanchist Behaviors in an Academic Style: A Qualitative Study to Analyze Academics’ Revenge

IF 0.8 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Oktay Koç, Abdullah Kiray, Serkan Özdemir
{"title":"Revanchist Behaviors in an Academic Style: A Qualitative Study to Analyze Academics’ Revenge","authors":"Oktay Koç, Abdullah Kiray, Serkan Özdemir","doi":"10.22059/IJMS.2020.289237.673796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on examining the counterproductive behaviors of academics, who have a lesser likelihood to show revanchist acts on account of the characteristics of their professional group, defining the purposes, means, and reasons of revenge, and determining the results of revanchist behaviors. To this end, we conducted a qualitative study on the academics who were working at Turkish state universities. In the end, the reasons, purposes, and means of revenge have been defined, and the results of revanchist behaviors have been determined through processing and analyzing interpretively collected data.  Accordingly, there are numerous rationales for revenge among academics as they define it personally and closely related to their personal character on one hand, and on the other hand, they tend to use various tools during revenge process, mostly a combination of semi-legal and legal ones since there are some obstacles (i.e. administrative sanction mechanisms) to use illegal tools. In addition, they aim to re-balance the situation and look for justice after any harmful action or activity stemmed from other parties. As a different result, revenge is defined as a tool for protecting self and self-interest(s).","PeriodicalId":51913,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Management Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"345-366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22059/IJMS.2020.289237.673796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study focuses on examining the counterproductive behaviors of academics, who have a lesser likelihood to show revanchist acts on account of the characteristics of their professional group, defining the purposes, means, and reasons of revenge, and determining the results of revanchist behaviors. To this end, we conducted a qualitative study on the academics who were working at Turkish state universities. In the end, the reasons, purposes, and means of revenge have been defined, and the results of revanchist behaviors have been determined through processing and analyzing interpretively collected data.  Accordingly, there are numerous rationales for revenge among academics as they define it personally and closely related to their personal character on one hand, and on the other hand, they tend to use various tools during revenge process, mostly a combination of semi-legal and legal ones since there are some obstacles (i.e. administrative sanction mechanisms) to use illegal tools. In addition, they aim to re-balance the situation and look for justice after any harmful action or activity stemmed from other parties. As a different result, revenge is defined as a tool for protecting self and self-interest(s).
学术风格中的复仇行为:学者复仇行为的定性分析
本研究的重点是研究学者的反生产行为,由于其专业群体的特点,他们表现出复仇行为的可能性较小,定义了报复的目的、手段和原因,并确定了复仇行为的结果。为此,我们对在土耳其国立大学工作的学者进行了定性研究。最后,定义了复仇的原因、目的和手段,并通过处理和分析解释性收集的数据确定了复仇行为的结果。因此,学者们对报复的定义有很多依据,一方面是他们个人对报复的定义,与他们的个人性格密切相关,另一方面,他们在报复过程中往往会使用各种各样的工具,因为使用非法工具存在一些障碍(即行政制裁机制),所以他们往往会使用半合法和合法的手段相结合。此外,他们的目标是重新平衡局势,并在其他各方的任何有害行动或活动之后寻求正义。作为一个不同的结果,复仇被定义为一种保护自我和自身利益的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信