E. Shahverdi, M. Moghaddam, H. Sheibani, Shadi Voghoufi
{"title":"Dealing with a clinically important anti-M case with cross-reactivity induced by monoclonal typing reagent","authors":"E. Shahverdi, M. Moghaddam, H. Sheibani, Shadi Voghoufi","doi":"10.19082/7791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The naturally occurring \"Anti-M\" antibody, which is usually active at temperatures below 37 °C and has no clinical significance, can lead to discrepancy in ABO blood grouping and confusion in diagnosis. Case Presentation: This paper reports the case of a 28-year-old woman whose unanticipated reaction in her reverse blood grouping was observed due to the presence of anti-M, which made interpretation of her blood group difficult. The reason for this discrepancy created an interesting case to analyze. Take-away Lesson: A laboratory should always choose the reagent that is most suitable to the profiles of patients referred to that laboratory. It should be noted that if an anti-M is found in an M+ patient with negative autocontrol, it is not correct to conclude that there is a \"partial M\".","PeriodicalId":11603,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Physician","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19082/7791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The naturally occurring "Anti-M" antibody, which is usually active at temperatures below 37 °C and has no clinical significance, can lead to discrepancy in ABO blood grouping and confusion in diagnosis. Case Presentation: This paper reports the case of a 28-year-old woman whose unanticipated reaction in her reverse blood grouping was observed due to the presence of anti-M, which made interpretation of her blood group difficult. The reason for this discrepancy created an interesting case to analyze. Take-away Lesson: A laboratory should always choose the reagent that is most suitable to the profiles of patients referred to that laboratory. It should be noted that if an anti-M is found in an M+ patient with negative autocontrol, it is not correct to conclude that there is a "partial M".