M. Arora, I. Mustafa, R. Mahat, Sudeep Kumar, K. Muzammil, Saurabh Arora, Sumesh Prasad Sah
{"title":"Impact of multimedia as a teaching tool on the performance of the 1st year MBBS students for academic achievements in India","authors":"M. Arora, I. Mustafa, R. Mahat, Sudeep Kumar, K. Muzammil, Saurabh Arora, Sumesh Prasad Sah","doi":"10.22038/FMEJ.2019.40134.1265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are various methods of teaching adopted by teachers/professors in medical colleges to deliver the lectures to the students. The present study aimed to find out the impact of multimedia as a teaching tool on the performance of the 1st year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students for academic achievements. Methods: This was a Quasi-experimental study, conducted for three months (April to June 2016) at Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, India.Total of 150 students of the 1st year MBBS were recruited for this study and two groups were formed (i.e. Group I and Group II). Each group included 75 students. Group I were taught by a traditional way of teaching and Group II were taught by using multimedia. Two tools were used viz, pre and posttest based on MCQs to assess the impact of multimedia on studentsâ�� academic achievement. After taking the post-academic test, both groups were rotated i.e. in group I, lectures were delivered by using multimedia and in group II, lectures were delivered by the traditional way of teaching in order to get feedback from all 150 students to know the better way of teaching method.  Results: There was no significant difference in the average marks obtained by students between Group I and II (18.73±3.39 vs. 18.8±3.76 ) before delivering lectures to them. However, after delivering the lectures, the average mark obtained by the students of Group II was found to be significantly higher as compared to Group I (70.78±12.01 vs. 49.33±9.75 ). Conclusion: The use of interactive multimedia tool found to be more effective for presenting the information than the traditional way of teaching.Â","PeriodicalId":34243,"journal":{"name":"Future of Medical Education Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"46-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2019.40134.1265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There are various methods of teaching adopted by teachers/professors in medical colleges to deliver the lectures to the students. The present study aimed to find out the impact of multimedia as a teaching tool on the performance of the 1st year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students for academic achievements. Methods: This was a Quasi-experimental study, conducted for three months (April to June 2016) at Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, India.Total of 150 students of the 1st year MBBS were recruited for this study and two groups were formed (i.e. Group I and Group II). Each group included 75 students. Group I were taught by a traditional way of teaching and Group II were taught by using multimedia. Two tools were used viz, pre and posttest based on MCQs to assess the impact of multimedia on studentsâ�� academic achievement. After taking the post-academic test, both groups were rotated i.e. in group I, lectures were delivered by using multimedia and in group II, lectures were delivered by the traditional way of teaching in order to get feedback from all 150 students to know the better way of teaching method.  Results: There was no significant difference in the average marks obtained by students between Group I and II (18.73±3.39 vs. 18.8±3.76 ) before delivering lectures to them. However, after delivering the lectures, the average mark obtained by the students of Group II was found to be significantly higher as compared to Group I (70.78±12.01 vs. 49.33±9.75 ). Conclusion: The use of interactive multimedia tool found to be more effective for presenting the information than the traditional way of teaching.Â
背景:医学院校的教师/教授在给学生讲课时采用了多种教学方法。本研究旨在探讨多媒体教学对医外科学学士(MBBS)一年级学生学业成绩的影响。方法:这是一项准实验研究,于2016年4月至6月在印度Muzaffarnagar医学院进行了为期三个月的研究。本研究共招募了150名MBBS一年级的学生,分为两组(第一组和第二组),每组75名学生。第一组采用传统教学方式,第二组采用多媒体教学方式。采用基于mcq的前测和后测两种工具来评估多媒体对学生学习成绩的影响。在参加完课后测试后,两组轮换进行,第一组使用多媒体授课,第二组使用传统教学方式授课,以便从所有150名学生那里获得反馈,了解更好的教学方法。Â结果:第一组学生与第二组学生在授课前的平均成绩(18.73±3.39 vs. 18.8±3.76)无显著差异。然而,在讲课结束后,发现第二组学生的平均分数明显高于第一组(70.78±12.01 vs. 49.33±9.75)。结论:使用交互式多媒体工具比传统的teaching.Â方式更能有效地呈现信息