Spanish Republicanism: Zuruck zu Kant?

IF 0.2 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
P. Cella
{"title":"Spanish Republicanism: Zuruck zu Kant?","authors":"P. Cella","doi":"10.29375/01240781.4276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some Spanish republican theorists argue for recovering Immanuel Kant’s philosophy for the left, rescuing him from his unwarranted appropriation by the right and correcting his neglect by progressivism. This article argues that this project is misguided in three ways. First, the implication that conservatism has claimed Kant for its camp is simply wrong, given that intellectuals on the right have long explicitly rejected him. Second, it rests on a faulty premise: that the left and right disagree about abstract concepts. Rather, conservatism represents an ad hoc defense of existing power structures without any firm theoretical commitments. Third, Kant is clearly progressive, as he wrote against conservative contemporaries. To conclude, I claim that the progressives’ ill-founded attempt to recover Kant is symptomatic of a broader misunderstanding in how progressives define progressivism and conservatism. I propose rethinking these definitions.","PeriodicalId":40785,"journal":{"name":"Reflexion Politica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflexion Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some Spanish republican theorists argue for recovering Immanuel Kant’s philosophy for the left, rescuing him from his unwarranted appropriation by the right and correcting his neglect by progressivism. This article argues that this project is misguided in three ways. First, the implication that conservatism has claimed Kant for its camp is simply wrong, given that intellectuals on the right have long explicitly rejected him. Second, it rests on a faulty premise: that the left and right disagree about abstract concepts. Rather, conservatism represents an ad hoc defense of existing power structures without any firm theoretical commitments. Third, Kant is clearly progressive, as he wrote against conservative contemporaries. To conclude, I claim that the progressives’ ill-founded attempt to recover Kant is symptomatic of a broader misunderstanding in how progressives define progressivism and conservatism. I propose rethinking these definitions.
西班牙退到Kant?
一些西班牙共和主义理论家主张为左派恢复伊曼努尔·康德的哲学,把他从被右派毫无根据的挪用中拯救出来,并用进步主义纠正他的忽视。本文认为,这个项目在三个方面被误导了。首先,保守主义宣称康德为其阵营的暗示是完全错误的,因为右翼知识分子长期以来一直明确反对康德。其次,它建立在一个错误的前提之上:左翼和右翼在抽象概念上存在分歧。相反,保守主义代表了对现有权力结构的特别辩护,没有任何坚定的理论承诺。第三,康德显然是进步的,因为他反对同时代的保守主义者。综上所述,我认为进步派试图恢复康德的观点是毫无根据的,这反映了进步派对进步主义和保守主义的定义存在更广泛的误解。我建议重新思考这些定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reflexion Politica
Reflexion Politica POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信