Understanding Start-up Employees’ Communicative Behaviors on an Employer Review Website: A Comparison of TikTok and Snapchat

IF 2.3 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Soojin Kim, Lisa Tam, Seung Bach
{"title":"Understanding Start-up Employees’ Communicative Behaviors on an Employer Review Website: A Comparison of TikTok and Snapchat","authors":"Soojin Kim, Lisa Tam, Seung Bach","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2021.2011732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To provide insights into start-ups’ reputation management, this study aims to explore how employees of a start-up, being, in a broad sense, an entrepreneurial firm, evaluate their employer on an employer review platform. Specifically, it compares the reputational opportunities and challenges of TikTok as a start-up and Snapchat as a more established company in the same industry. It explores the cognitive and evaluative representations employees associate with their employers in reviews. To do this, a total of 644 English-language employee reviews were collected from Glassdoor, an employer review platform on which former and current employees anonymously post reviews about their organizations. Content analysis was then conducted, unveiling 14 thematic topics. The top three most frequently mentioned topics were work environment, co-workers, and salaries and benefits. A comparison of the two companies showed that TikTok received a proportionately higher number of positive reviews about career progression opportunities, work environment, and office and location. However, it also received proportionately more negative reviews on work arrangements, salaries and benefits, and intrinsic rewards. Theoretical and empirical implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":"16 1","pages":"291 - 312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2021.2011732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT To provide insights into start-ups’ reputation management, this study aims to explore how employees of a start-up, being, in a broad sense, an entrepreneurial firm, evaluate their employer on an employer review platform. Specifically, it compares the reputational opportunities and challenges of TikTok as a start-up and Snapchat as a more established company in the same industry. It explores the cognitive and evaluative representations employees associate with their employers in reviews. To do this, a total of 644 English-language employee reviews were collected from Glassdoor, an employer review platform on which former and current employees anonymously post reviews about their organizations. Content analysis was then conducted, unveiling 14 thematic topics. The top three most frequently mentioned topics were work environment, co-workers, and salaries and benefits. A comparison of the two companies showed that TikTok received a proportionately higher number of positive reviews about career progression opportunities, work environment, and office and location. However, it also received proportionately more negative reviews on work arrangements, salaries and benefits, and intrinsic rewards. Theoretical and empirical implications are discussed.
了解创业公司员工在雇主评论网站上的交流行为:TikTok和Snapchat的比较
摘要为了深入了解初创企业的声誉管理,本研究旨在探讨广义上的创业型企业——初创企业的员工如何在雇主评价平台上评价他们的雇主。具体来说,它比较了TikTok作为一家初创公司和Snapchat作为同行业中更成熟的公司在声誉方面的机遇和挑战。它探讨了员工在评估中与雇主联系的认知和评价表征。为此,调查人员从雇主评论平台Glassdoor收集了644份英文员工评论。Glassdoor是一个雇主评论平台,前任和现任员工可以在该平台上匿名发表对公司的评论。然后进行了内容分析,揭示了14个主题。最常被提及的三个话题是工作环境、同事和工资福利。两家公司的比较显示,TikTok在职业发展机会、工作环境、办公地点等方面获得的正面评价比例更高。然而,在工作安排、工资福利和内在奖励方面,它也相应地得到了更多的负面评价。讨论了理论和实证意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Strategic Communication
International Journal of Strategic Communication Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Strategic Communication examines the philosophical, theoretical, and applied nature of strategic communication, which is “the purposeful use of communication by an organization to fulfill its mission.” IJSC provides a foundation for the study of strategic communication from diverse disciplines, including corporate and managerial communication, organizational communication, public relations, marketing communication, advertising, political and health communication, social marketing, international relations, public diplomacy, and other specialized communication areas. The IJSC is the singular forum for multidisciplinary inquiry of this nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信