A review of normalization and differential abundance methods for microbiome counts data

IF 4.4 2区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Dionne Swift, Kellen Cresswell, Robert Johnson, Spiro C. Stilianoudakis, Xingtao Wei
{"title":"A review of normalization and differential abundance methods for microbiome counts data","authors":"Dionne Swift, Kellen Cresswell, Robert Johnson, Spiro C. Stilianoudakis, Xingtao Wei","doi":"10.1002/wics.1586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent development of cost‐effective high‐throughput DNA sequencing technologies has tremendously increased microbiome research. However, it has been well documented that the observed microbiome data suffers from compositionality, sparsity, and high variability. All of which pose serious challenges when analyzing microbiome data. Over the last decade, there has been considerable amount of interest into statistical and computational methods to tackle these challenges. The choice of inference aids in the selection of the appropriate statistical methods since only a few methods allow inferences for absolute abundance while most methods allow inferences for relative abundances. An overview of recent methods for differential abundance analysis and normalization of microbiome data is presented, focusing on methods that are accessible but have not been widely covered in previous literature. In detailed descriptions of each method, we discuss assumptions and if and how these methods address the challenges of microbiome data. These methods are compared based on accuracy metrics in real and simulated settings. The goal is to provide a comprehensive but non‐exhaustive set of potential and easily‐accessible tools for differential abundance and normalization of microbiome data.","PeriodicalId":47779,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The recent development of cost‐effective high‐throughput DNA sequencing technologies has tremendously increased microbiome research. However, it has been well documented that the observed microbiome data suffers from compositionality, sparsity, and high variability. All of which pose serious challenges when analyzing microbiome data. Over the last decade, there has been considerable amount of interest into statistical and computational methods to tackle these challenges. The choice of inference aids in the selection of the appropriate statistical methods since only a few methods allow inferences for absolute abundance while most methods allow inferences for relative abundances. An overview of recent methods for differential abundance analysis and normalization of microbiome data is presented, focusing on methods that are accessible but have not been widely covered in previous literature. In detailed descriptions of each method, we discuss assumptions and if and how these methods address the challenges of microbiome data. These methods are compared based on accuracy metrics in real and simulated settings. The goal is to provide a comprehensive but non‐exhaustive set of potential and easily‐accessible tools for differential abundance and normalization of microbiome data.
微生物组计数数据的归一化和差分丰度方法综述
近年来,低成本高通量DNA测序技术的发展极大地促进了微生物组的研究。然而,已经有充分的证据表明,观察到的微生物组数据存在组合性、稀疏性和高变异性。所有这些都给分析微生物组数据带来了严峻的挑战。在过去的十年中,人们对解决这些挑战的统计和计算方法产生了相当大的兴趣。推理的选择有助于选择适当的统计方法,因为只有少数方法允许对绝对丰度进行推理,而大多数方法允许对相对丰度进行推理。概述了微生物组数据的差异丰度分析和规范化的最新方法,重点介绍了以前文献中尚未广泛覆盖的方法。在每种方法的详细描述中,我们讨论了假设,以及这些方法是否以及如何解决微生物组数据的挑战。在真实和模拟环境下,对这些方法的精度指标进行了比较。目标是为微生物组数据的差异丰度和规范化提供一套全面但非详尽的潜在和易于获取的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信