Joint Frailty Model of Recurrent and Terminal Events in the Presence of Cure Fraction using a Bayesian Approach

Q4 Medicine
Zahra Arab Borzu, A. Baghestani, E. Talebi Ghane, Aliakbar Khadem Maboudi, A. Akhavan, A. Saeedi
{"title":"Joint Frailty Model of Recurrent and Terminal Events in the Presence of Cure Fraction using a Bayesian Approach","authors":"Zahra Arab Borzu, A. Baghestani, E. Talebi Ghane, Aliakbar Khadem Maboudi, A. Akhavan, A. Saeedi","doi":"10.18502/jbe.v8i3.12306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Recurrent event data are common in many longitudinal studies. Often, a terminating event such as death can be correlated with the recurrent event process. A shared frailty model applied to account for the association between recurrent and terminal events. In some situations, a fraction of subjects experience neither recurrent events nor death; these subjects are cured. \nMethods: In this paper, we discussed the Bayesian approach of a joint frailty model for recurrent and terminal events in the presence of cure fraction. We compared estimates of parameters in the Frequentist and Bayesian approaches via simulation studies in various sample sizes; we applied the joint frailty model in the presence of cure fraction with Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for breast cancer. \nResults: In small sample size Bayesian approach compared to Frequentist approach had a smaller standard error and mean square error, and the coverage probabilities close to nominal level of 95%. Also, in Bayesian approach, the sampling means of the estimated standard errors were close to the empirical standard error. \nConclusion: The simulation results suggested that when sample size was small, the use of Bayesian joint frailty model in the presence of cure fraction led to more efficiency in parameter estimation and statistical inference.","PeriodicalId":34310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v8i3.12306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recurrent event data are common in many longitudinal studies. Often, a terminating event such as death can be correlated with the recurrent event process. A shared frailty model applied to account for the association between recurrent and terminal events. In some situations, a fraction of subjects experience neither recurrent events nor death; these subjects are cured. Methods: In this paper, we discussed the Bayesian approach of a joint frailty model for recurrent and terminal events in the presence of cure fraction. We compared estimates of parameters in the Frequentist and Bayesian approaches via simulation studies in various sample sizes; we applied the joint frailty model in the presence of cure fraction with Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for breast cancer. Results: In small sample size Bayesian approach compared to Frequentist approach had a smaller standard error and mean square error, and the coverage probabilities close to nominal level of 95%. Also, in Bayesian approach, the sampling means of the estimated standard errors were close to the empirical standard error. Conclusion: The simulation results suggested that when sample size was small, the use of Bayesian joint frailty model in the presence of cure fraction led to more efficiency in parameter estimation and statistical inference.
使用贝叶斯方法建立复发性和终末性事件的联合衰弱模型
重复事件数据在许多纵向研究中是常见的。通常,终止事件(如死亡)可以与反复发生的事件过程相关联。用于解释复发性和终末性事件之间关联的共享脆弱性模型。在某些情况下,一小部分受试者既没有复发事件,也没有死亡;这些问题都被治愈了。方法:在本文中,我们讨论了在存在治愈分数的情况下复发和终末事件的联合脆弱性模型的贝叶斯方法。我们通过不同样本量的模拟研究,比较了频率主义者和贝叶斯方法的参数估计;我们应用关节脆弱模型在治疗分数与频率和贝叶斯方法存在乳腺癌。结果:在小样本量下,贝叶斯方法的标准误差和均方误差均小于Frequentist方法,覆盖概率接近95%的名义水平。在贝叶斯方法中,估计标准误差的抽样均值接近经验标准误差。结论:仿真结果表明,在样本量较小的情况下,使用存在治愈分数的贝叶斯关节脆性模型,参数估计和统计推断效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信