Anjali Singh, A. Singla, A. Puri, S. Chaudhary, Anushri Dutta
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of smile attractiveness in various orthodontic treatment modalities- A cross-sectional study","authors":"Anjali Singh, A. Singla, A. Puri, S. Chaudhary, Anushri Dutta","doi":"10.3126/ojn.v12i2.38228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Smile plays a significant role in facial attractiveness and social interactions. The present study aimed to evaluate the smile attractiveness in subjects treated with extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment modality.\nMaterials and Methods: Frontal smiling photographs of 100 orthodontically treated subjects with an age range of 16-25 years were taken and divided into two groups each having 50 subjects. Group I (ANB 0° to 4° ) was subdivided into cases treated with extraction (group la) and without extraction (group lb). Similarly, Group II (ANB > 4°) was subdivided into cases treated with extraction (group lla) and without extraction (group lib). Smile esthetics and esthetic scores were assessed on frontal smile photographs by using different smile variables objectively and with the help of raters (10 laypersons,10 dental graduates, and 10 orthodontists) subjectively.\nResults: In extraction cases, the esthetic scores of dental practitioners and orthodontists were higher than in cases of non-extraction. Between extraction and non-extraction cases, laypeople had no esthetic preference. In Skeletal class I, smile variables such as the arch form index, smile arc and maxillary incisor show had a higher value in extraction cases however, the buccal corridor was more in non-extraction cases. In Skeletal Class II, smile variables such as the maxillary incisor show and arch form index were more in extraction cases and exposure of mandibular teeth was more in non-extraction cases. Judgement given by the raters was mainly based on maxillary incisor show, number of teeth displayed, and buccal corridor ratio. In orthodontic patients treated with and without the extraction, statistically non-significant variations in smile esthetics and esthetic scores were found.\nConclusion: Thus, a decision regarding the extraction of teeth in orthodontic patients should not be solely based on smile esthetics but other factors which determine extraction should be considered.","PeriodicalId":31197,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v12i2.38228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Smile plays a significant role in facial attractiveness and social interactions. The present study aimed to evaluate the smile attractiveness in subjects treated with extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment modality.
Materials and Methods: Frontal smiling photographs of 100 orthodontically treated subjects with an age range of 16-25 years were taken and divided into two groups each having 50 subjects. Group I (ANB 0° to 4° ) was subdivided into cases treated with extraction (group la) and without extraction (group lb). Similarly, Group II (ANB > 4°) was subdivided into cases treated with extraction (group lla) and without extraction (group lib). Smile esthetics and esthetic scores were assessed on frontal smile photographs by using different smile variables objectively and with the help of raters (10 laypersons,10 dental graduates, and 10 orthodontists) subjectively.
Results: In extraction cases, the esthetic scores of dental practitioners and orthodontists were higher than in cases of non-extraction. Between extraction and non-extraction cases, laypeople had no esthetic preference. In Skeletal class I, smile variables such as the arch form index, smile arc and maxillary incisor show had a higher value in extraction cases however, the buccal corridor was more in non-extraction cases. In Skeletal Class II, smile variables such as the maxillary incisor show and arch form index were more in extraction cases and exposure of mandibular teeth was more in non-extraction cases. Judgement given by the raters was mainly based on maxillary incisor show, number of teeth displayed, and buccal corridor ratio. In orthodontic patients treated with and without the extraction, statistically non-significant variations in smile esthetics and esthetic scores were found.
Conclusion: Thus, a decision regarding the extraction of teeth in orthodontic patients should not be solely based on smile esthetics but other factors which determine extraction should be considered.
背景:微笑在面部吸引力和社交互动中起着重要作用。本研究旨在评估接受拔牙或非拔牙正畸治疗的受试者的微笑吸引力。材料和方法:拍摄100名年龄在16-25岁之间接受正畸治疗的受试者的正面微笑照片,并将其分为两组,每组50名受试者。I组(ANB 0°至4°)分为提取组(la组)和不提取组(lb组)。类似地,第II组(ANB>4°)被细分为经提取处理的病例(lla组)和未经提取的病例(lib组)。通过客观地使用不同的微笑变量,并在评分者(10名非专业人员、10名牙科毕业生和10名正畸医生)的帮助下,主观地评估正面微笑照片的微笑美学和美学得分。结果:在拔牙病例中,牙科医生和正畸医生的审美得分高于未拔牙病例。在提取和非提取病例之间,外行人没有审美偏好。在骨骼I类中,微笑变量,如拱形指数、微笑弧和上切牙显示,在拔牙病例中具有更高的值,而在非拔牙病例中,颊廊的值更多。在Skeletal Class II中,微笑变量(如上颌切牙显示和足弓形状指数)在拔除病例中更多,而下颌牙齿暴露在非拔除病例中则更多。评分者的判断主要基于上切牙显示、显示的牙齿数量和颊廊比例。在接受和不接受拔牙治疗的正畸患者中,发现微笑美学和美学评分在统计学上没有显著差异。结论:因此,决定正畸患者的牙齿拔除不应仅仅基于微笑美学,还应考虑决定拔除的其他因素。