Ethnopharmacologic search for psychoactive drugs

IF 2.2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
M. Winkelman
{"title":"Ethnopharmacologic search for psychoactive drugs","authors":"M. Winkelman","doi":"10.1556/2054.2020.00141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These two volumes bring together two very different eras of psychedelic studies, its early florescence in the 1960s and a current wave reflecting cumulative developments fifty years later. Both are based on conferences sharing the same title given to the book, an open exploration of the potential for modern science and medicine to engage with the pharmacological abundance provided by nature and embodied in the remnants of shamanic entheogenic traditions. The first volume covers an international conference including researchers from diverse fields – psychiatry, medicine, botany, pharmacology, chemistry and anthropology – that came together in San Francisco in 1967 for three days under what might have been seen as auspicious circumstances – a conference sponsored by agencies of the US government, the National Institute of Mental Health and US Public Health Service. The second volume is the compilation of 21 papers presented 50 years later in 2017 when an even more diverse group of scholars came together to share some of the new findings that emerged since the first conference, reflecting the psychedelics renaissance that emerged in the 21st century during a stifling decades long War on Drugs funded by the same government that sponsored the first conference 50 years ago. As the second volume shows, in spite of such draconian repression, the field of ethnopharmacological psychedelic studies has progressed to the point that we are now able to discuss the numerous discoveries of the therapeutic potential of these diverse substances in spite of their continued stigmatization. The first conference included a who’s who of 20th century psychedelic research with such famous stalwarts as Richard Evans Schultes, Gordon Wasson, Claudio Naranjo, Alexander Shulgin, and Daniel Freedman, but the majority of the participants are probably but historical footnotes to their 21st century intellectual descendants. Their presentations at this conference, however, are immortalized in this publication, first released in 1967 as Public Health Service Publication No. 1645 by the US Government Printing Office under the editorship of Daniel Efron, Bo Holmstedt and Nathan Kline. While the conference was dominated by US researchers, the international scope of the participants was reflected in researchers from Russia, Argentina, Mexico, Switzerland, Germany and Sweden. Efron’s preface alludes to issues still important and unresolved in the study of psychedelics such as the origins of humans’ psychotropic plant use and the identity of the psychoactive plants referred to in the Bible. Efron’s naivety is evident however, where he wonders if this Biblical drug use “brought happiness and comfort, or new problems, aggravations, and unhappiness” (p. ix). Apparently Efron’s memory of Sunday school teachings had faded as Genesis clearly tells us that the gods were definitely displeased with humans taking the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil, and fearing that humans would also use this knowledge to partake of the Tree of Immortality, the gods banished Adam and Eve from an idyllic Eden and sent them to toil and suffer in the outside world. Seems like this early engagement with psychotropics provoked the first war on drugs! The focus of the conference was however, not on such weighty theological issues but on the importance of knowledge about plant compounds, the ethnopharmacological search for Journal of Psychedelic Studies","PeriodicalId":34732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychedelic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychedelic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

These two volumes bring together two very different eras of psychedelic studies, its early florescence in the 1960s and a current wave reflecting cumulative developments fifty years later. Both are based on conferences sharing the same title given to the book, an open exploration of the potential for modern science and medicine to engage with the pharmacological abundance provided by nature and embodied in the remnants of shamanic entheogenic traditions. The first volume covers an international conference including researchers from diverse fields – psychiatry, medicine, botany, pharmacology, chemistry and anthropology – that came together in San Francisco in 1967 for three days under what might have been seen as auspicious circumstances – a conference sponsored by agencies of the US government, the National Institute of Mental Health and US Public Health Service. The second volume is the compilation of 21 papers presented 50 years later in 2017 when an even more diverse group of scholars came together to share some of the new findings that emerged since the first conference, reflecting the psychedelics renaissance that emerged in the 21st century during a stifling decades long War on Drugs funded by the same government that sponsored the first conference 50 years ago. As the second volume shows, in spite of such draconian repression, the field of ethnopharmacological psychedelic studies has progressed to the point that we are now able to discuss the numerous discoveries of the therapeutic potential of these diverse substances in spite of their continued stigmatization. The first conference included a who’s who of 20th century psychedelic research with such famous stalwarts as Richard Evans Schultes, Gordon Wasson, Claudio Naranjo, Alexander Shulgin, and Daniel Freedman, but the majority of the participants are probably but historical footnotes to their 21st century intellectual descendants. Their presentations at this conference, however, are immortalized in this publication, first released in 1967 as Public Health Service Publication No. 1645 by the US Government Printing Office under the editorship of Daniel Efron, Bo Holmstedt and Nathan Kline. While the conference was dominated by US researchers, the international scope of the participants was reflected in researchers from Russia, Argentina, Mexico, Switzerland, Germany and Sweden. Efron’s preface alludes to issues still important and unresolved in the study of psychedelics such as the origins of humans’ psychotropic plant use and the identity of the psychoactive plants referred to in the Bible. Efron’s naivety is evident however, where he wonders if this Biblical drug use “brought happiness and comfort, or new problems, aggravations, and unhappiness” (p. ix). Apparently Efron’s memory of Sunday school teachings had faded as Genesis clearly tells us that the gods were definitely displeased with humans taking the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil, and fearing that humans would also use this knowledge to partake of the Tree of Immortality, the gods banished Adam and Eve from an idyllic Eden and sent them to toil and suffer in the outside world. Seems like this early engagement with psychotropics provoked the first war on drugs! The focus of the conference was however, not on such weighty theological issues but on the importance of knowledge about plant compounds, the ethnopharmacological search for Journal of Psychedelic Studies
精神活性药物的民族药理学研究
这两卷汇集了两个非常不同的时代的迷幻药研究,它的早期花期在20世纪60年代和当前的波反映累积发展50年后。这两本书都是基于分享同一书名的会议,对现代科学和医学的潜力进行了开放的探索,以参与大自然提供的丰富药理学,并体现在萨满教的遗存中。第一卷涵盖了一个国际会议,包括来自不同领域的研究人员——精神病学、医学、植物学、药理学、化学和人类学——1967年在一个可能被视为吉祥的环境下,在旧金山聚集了三天,这个会议由美国政府机构、国家精神卫生研究所和美国公共卫生服务组织。第二卷是50年后的2017年发表的21篇论文的汇编,当时一群更加多样化的学者聚集在一起,分享了自第一次会议以来出现的一些新发现,反映了21世纪在长达数十年的令人压抑的毒品战争中出现的迷幻药复兴,该战争由50年前赞助第一次会议的同一政府资助。正如第二卷所示,尽管受到如此严厉的压制,民族药理学迷幻药的研究领域已经取得了进展,我们现在能够讨论这些不同物质的治疗潜力的众多发现,尽管它们继续被污名化。第一次会议包括了20世纪迷幻研究的名人,其中包括理查德·埃文斯·舒尔特斯、戈登·沃森、克劳迪奥·纳兰霍、亚历山大·舒尔金和丹尼尔·弗里德曼等著名的中坚分子,但大多数与会者可能只是他们21世纪知识分子后代的历史注脚。然而,他们在这次会议上的发言却在这本出版物中永垂不朽,这本出版物于1967年首次发行,由美国政府印刷局作为公共卫生服务出版物第1645号发行,由丹尼尔·埃夫隆、博·霍尔姆斯泰特和内森·克莱恩编辑。虽然这次会议以美国研究人员为主,但与会者的国际范围反映在来自俄罗斯、阿根廷、墨西哥、瑞士、德国和瑞典的研究人员身上。埃夫隆的序言暗示了一些在迷幻药研究中仍然重要且未解决的问题,比如人类使用精神植物的起源,以及圣经中提到的精神活性植物的身份。然而,埃夫隆的天真是显而易见的,他想知道这种圣经中的药物使用是否“带来了快乐和安慰,或者新的问题,恶化和不快乐”(第9页)。显然,埃夫隆对主日学的教导已经淡忘,因为创世纪清楚地告诉我们,神对人类从善恶之树上摘果子肯定不满意,并担心人类也会利用这些知识来分享不朽之树。众神把亚当和夏娃逐出了田园般的伊甸园,让他们到外面的世界去吃苦耐劳。似乎早期对精神药物的研究引发了第一次毒品战争!然而,会议的焦点不是这些沉重的神学问题,而是关于植物化合物知识的重要性,以及《迷幻研究杂志》的民族药理学研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychedelic Studies
Journal of Psychedelic Studies Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.90%
发文量
20
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信