{"title":"The Memory of Southern European Dictatorships in Popular TV Shows","authors":"Kostis Kornetis","doi":"10.1017/S0960777322000741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ever since the ground-breaking historical mini-series Holocaust (1978), television has proven to play a major role in structuring the collective memory about the past.1 This medium has, moreover, displayed a capacity to trigger a collective rendering of, and coming to terms with, painful, hidden or forgotten aspects of the past. Media specialist Garry R. Edgerton has even argued that ‘television is the principal means by which most people learn about history’.2 Even though such assertions might be tempered by today's predominance of social media – especially in generational terms – an inquiry into the politics of memory in popular television is still relevant for the field of public history, as well as for memory studies. This is particularly pertinent when representing dictatorship in the European South. Alongside public history projects of all kinds (including museums, memorials, commemorative plaques and practices), filmic representations (be it for cinematic or television use) structure the collective imaginary about the recent past. This essay briefly discusses TV shows that deal with and shape public understandings of the dictatorships in Spain (the final phase of Francoism, post-1968), Greece (the Colonels’ dictatorship, post-1969) and Portugal (the final phase of the Estado Novo (New State), post-1968).","PeriodicalId":46066,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary European History","volume":"32 1","pages":"46 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary European History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777322000741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ever since the ground-breaking historical mini-series Holocaust (1978), television has proven to play a major role in structuring the collective memory about the past.1 This medium has, moreover, displayed a capacity to trigger a collective rendering of, and coming to terms with, painful, hidden or forgotten aspects of the past. Media specialist Garry R. Edgerton has even argued that ‘television is the principal means by which most people learn about history’.2 Even though such assertions might be tempered by today's predominance of social media – especially in generational terms – an inquiry into the politics of memory in popular television is still relevant for the field of public history, as well as for memory studies. This is particularly pertinent when representing dictatorship in the European South. Alongside public history projects of all kinds (including museums, memorials, commemorative plaques and practices), filmic representations (be it for cinematic or television use) structure the collective imaginary about the recent past. This essay briefly discusses TV shows that deal with and shape public understandings of the dictatorships in Spain (the final phase of Francoism, post-1968), Greece (the Colonels’ dictatorship, post-1969) and Portugal (the final phase of the Estado Novo (New State), post-1968).
自从开创性的历史迷你剧《大屠杀》(1978)以来,电视已被证明在构建关于过去的集体记忆方面发挥了重要作用此外,这种媒介还显示出一种能力,可以引发对过去痛苦、隐藏或被遗忘的方面的集体呈现和接受。媒体专家Garry R. Edgerton甚至认为“电视是大多数人了解历史的主要手段”尽管这样的断言可能会被当今社会媒体的主导地位所削弱——尤其是在代际方面——但对大众电视中记忆政治的探究仍然与公共历史领域以及记忆研究有关。这在代表欧洲南部的独裁统治时尤为贴切。除了各种各样的公共历史项目(包括博物馆、纪念馆、纪念牌和实践),电影表现(无论是用于电影还是电视用途)构建了关于最近过去的集体想象。本文简要讨论了电视节目处理和塑造公众对西班牙独裁统治的理解(佛朗哥主义的最后阶段,1968年后),希腊(上校的独裁统治,1969年后)和葡萄牙(Estado Novo(新国家)的最后阶段,1968年后)。
期刊介绍:
Contemporary European History covers the history of Eastern and Western Europe, including the United Kingdom, from 1918 to the present. By combining a wide geographical compass with a relatively short time span, the journal achieves both range and depth in its coverage. It is open to all forms of historical inquiry - including cultural, economic, international, political and social approaches - and welcomes comparative analysis. One issue per year explores a broad theme under the guidance of a guest editor. The journal regularly features contributions from scholars outside the Anglophone community and acts as a channel of communication between European historians throughout the continent and beyond it.