To reach sustainable justice with Millennials: example of Ukraine

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW
O. Khotynska-Nor, I. Izarova
{"title":"To reach sustainable justice with Millennials: example of Ukraine","authors":"O. Khotynska-Nor, I. Izarova","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2022/12/4.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable development became an essential part of our world since we realized\nthe fragility and limits of our system, dangerous of resource exhaustion, and insistently\nlooking for the way to stabilyze our life and life of our descendents, to restrict risks of\ncollapses. Last years’ catastrophes – the pandemic of COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine,\nboth are still existed, show us undoubtedly that we have to be more careful using our\nresources and develop our relations in economics and politics. In this article authors made\nan attempt to reconsider the approaches to understanding judiciary in Ukraine, using the\nnew coordinates – generation born since 1980 till 1996 so called Millennials (generation Y),\ndictating new requests to life, and, in our opinion, to justice and judiciary development.\nAnalysis of the impact of Millennials (generation Y) on the development of the judicial system\nis a complex process for a number of reasons. First, the lack of formal information about the\nage of the parties makes it impossible to substantiate the conclusions with empirical data.\nSecondly, despite some generalized traits, the characteristics of Millennials differ depending\non the region and country of origin, which determines their economic, social, political, and\ncultural differences A striking example of this are the ex-Soviet Union’s states. In majority\nof these countries, Millennials have become the first generation sufficiently aware of their\nrights, the legal ways to protect them and the role of the court as an effective tool for such\nprotection. Their formation was accompanied by the changes in ideology, political regime\nand economic instability. In this article authors argue how Millennials change the judiciary\nin the ex-Soviet society, taking into account the specifics of the latter. The study suggests two\ninterrelated aspects: the impact of Millennials on the development of the court as consumers\nof judicial services; the impact of Millennials, who come to work in the judicial system, as\njudges. The article substantiates the necessity of modernization of the courts, which is\nassociated with the high technology of this generation and its vital need for information, as\nwell as their consumerization aimed to create more sustainability justice and to answer the\nrequest of Millennials by changes of goals, by limits of expenses and by introducing the\nculture of peaceful and strong institutions in judiciary.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2022/12/4.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable development became an essential part of our world since we realized the fragility and limits of our system, dangerous of resource exhaustion, and insistently looking for the way to stabilyze our life and life of our descendents, to restrict risks of collapses. Last years’ catastrophes – the pandemic of COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine, both are still existed, show us undoubtedly that we have to be more careful using our resources and develop our relations in economics and politics. In this article authors made an attempt to reconsider the approaches to understanding judiciary in Ukraine, using the new coordinates – generation born since 1980 till 1996 so called Millennials (generation Y), dictating new requests to life, and, in our opinion, to justice and judiciary development. Analysis of the impact of Millennials (generation Y) on the development of the judicial system is a complex process for a number of reasons. First, the lack of formal information about the age of the parties makes it impossible to substantiate the conclusions with empirical data. Secondly, despite some generalized traits, the characteristics of Millennials differ depending on the region and country of origin, which determines their economic, social, political, and cultural differences A striking example of this are the ex-Soviet Union’s states. In majority of these countries, Millennials have become the first generation sufficiently aware of their rights, the legal ways to protect them and the role of the court as an effective tool for such protection. Their formation was accompanied by the changes in ideology, political regime and economic instability. In this article authors argue how Millennials change the judiciary in the ex-Soviet society, taking into account the specifics of the latter. The study suggests two interrelated aspects: the impact of Millennials on the development of the court as consumers of judicial services; the impact of Millennials, who come to work in the judicial system, as judges. The article substantiates the necessity of modernization of the courts, which is associated with the high technology of this generation and its vital need for information, as well as their consumerization aimed to create more sustainability justice and to answer the request of Millennials by changes of goals, by limits of expenses and by introducing the culture of peaceful and strong institutions in judiciary.
与千禧一代实现可持续正义:以乌克兰为例
可持续发展成为我们世界的一个重要组成部分,因为我们意识到我们系统的脆弱性和局限性,资源枯竭的危险,并坚持寻找稳定我们和后代生活的方式,以限制崩溃的风险。去年的灾难——COVID-19大流行和乌克兰战争——都仍然存在,毫无疑问地告诉我们,我们必须更加谨慎地使用我们的资源,发展我们在经济和政治方面的关系。在本文中,作者试图重新考虑理解乌克兰司法的方法,使用新的坐标- 1980年至1996年出生的一代,即所谓的千禧一代(Y一代),对生活提出了新的要求,并且在我们看来,对正义和司法发展提出了新的要求。分析千禧一代(Y一代)对司法系统发展的影响是一个复杂的过程,原因有很多。首先,由于缺乏有关当事人年龄的正式信息,因此不可能用经验数据来证实结论。其次,尽管有一些普遍的特征,但千禧一代的特征因地区和原籍国而异,这决定了他们在经济、社会、政治和文化方面的差异。前苏联国家就是一个显著的例子。在这些国家中的大多数,千禧一代已经成为第一代充分意识到自己的权利、保护自己的法律途径以及法院作为有效保护工具的作用的人。它们的形成伴随着意识形态的变化、政治制度的变迁和经济的不稳定。在本文中,作者讨论了千禧一代如何改变前苏联社会的司法制度,并考虑了后者的具体情况。该研究提出了两个相互关联的方面:千禧一代作为司法服务的消费者对法院发展的影响;千禧一代的影响,他们以法官的身份在司法系统工作。这篇文章证实了法院现代化的必要性,这与这一代人的高科技和对信息的迫切需求以及他们的消费化有关,旨在创造更可持续的司法,并通过改变目标,限制费用和引入和平与强大的司法机构文化来回应千禧一代的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信