Guest Editor’s Introduction: International Tourism in the USSR: The Half-Open Door Policy

A. N. Chistikov
{"title":"Guest Editor’s Introduction: International Tourism in the USSR: The Half-Open Door Policy","authors":"A. N. Chistikov","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2021.2014757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on the history of international tourism in the USSR, which consisted of inbound (from foreign countries) and outbound (to foreign countries) tourism, is not one of the major areas of Russian historiography, yet the interest in this subject is obvious. The Soviet Union’s tourist ties with other countries are regarded by Russian and foreign scholars as part of cultural or public diplomacy, which on the one hand depended on the political realities of the times and, on the other, exerted a certain influence on them itself. Soviet historians mostly focused attention on the overall trends in the development of outbound tourism and on the legal issues of incoming tourism. Concrete historical studies for the most part concentrated on trips by Soviet tourists through trade unions and to a lesser extent on foreigners’ visits to the USSR. It was commonplace in all of the historical studies for the authors to pay close attention to ideological objectives and methods of working both with Soviet and with foreign tourists. Perestroika and the ensuing breakup of the USSR, the abandonment of the “only correct” ideology, and the “archival revolution” of the 1990s marked the start of a new stage in the historiography of this problem. The access to declassified documents significantly expanded the source base for research. The absence of censorship and the newly acquired opportunity to read the principal works of foreign colleagues (in particular, the monographs and articles of Prof. Michael David-Fox, the sociologist Paul Hollander, Prof. Ann E. Gorsuch, and others) have facilitated the formulation of new questions, including methodological ones. Similar processes have developed in some former Union republics that became independent countries. There is no debate among historians about the Soviet state’s regulatory role in prewar and postwar international tourism. In addition, most researchers do not confine themselves to studying the ideological and","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"59 1","pages":"181 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian studies in history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2021.2014757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on the history of international tourism in the USSR, which consisted of inbound (from foreign countries) and outbound (to foreign countries) tourism, is not one of the major areas of Russian historiography, yet the interest in this subject is obvious. The Soviet Union’s tourist ties with other countries are regarded by Russian and foreign scholars as part of cultural or public diplomacy, which on the one hand depended on the political realities of the times and, on the other, exerted a certain influence on them itself. Soviet historians mostly focused attention on the overall trends in the development of outbound tourism and on the legal issues of incoming tourism. Concrete historical studies for the most part concentrated on trips by Soviet tourists through trade unions and to a lesser extent on foreigners’ visits to the USSR. It was commonplace in all of the historical studies for the authors to pay close attention to ideological objectives and methods of working both with Soviet and with foreign tourists. Perestroika and the ensuing breakup of the USSR, the abandonment of the “only correct” ideology, and the “archival revolution” of the 1990s marked the start of a new stage in the historiography of this problem. The access to declassified documents significantly expanded the source base for research. The absence of censorship and the newly acquired opportunity to read the principal works of foreign colleagues (in particular, the monographs and articles of Prof. Michael David-Fox, the sociologist Paul Hollander, Prof. Ann E. Gorsuch, and others) have facilitated the formulation of new questions, including methodological ones. Similar processes have developed in some former Union republics that became independent countries. There is no debate among historians about the Soviet state’s regulatory role in prewar and postwar international tourism. In addition, most researchers do not confine themselves to studying the ideological and
客座编辑简介:苏联的国际旅游:半开放政策
对苏联国际旅游史的研究,包括入境(来自外国)和出境(前往外国)旅游,并不是俄罗斯史学的主要领域之一,但对这一主题的兴趣是显而易见的。苏联与其他国家的旅游关系被俄罗斯和外国学者视为文化或公共外交的一部分,这一方面取决于时代的政治现实,另一方面也对它们本身产生了一定的影响。苏联历史学家主要关注出境旅游发展的总体趋势和入境旅游的法律问题。具体的历史研究在很大程度上集中于苏联游客通过工会的旅行,而在较小程度上则集中于外国人访问苏联。在所有的历史研究中,作者密切关注与苏联和外国游客合作的意识形态目标和方法是司空见惯的。改革和随之而来的苏联解体,放弃“唯一正确”的意识形态,以及20世纪90年代的“档案革命”,标志着这一问题史学进入了一个新阶段。解密文件的获取大大扩大了研究的来源基础。审查制度的缺失和新获得的阅读外国同事主要著作的机会(特别是迈克尔·大卫·福克斯教授、社会学家保罗·霍兰德、安·E·戈萨奇教授和其他人的专著和文章)促进了新问题的提出,包括方法论问题。一些成为独立国家的前联邦共和国也发展了类似的进程。历史学家们对苏联国家在战前和战后国际旅游业中的监管作用没有争论。此外,大多数研究者并不局限于研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信