Economic evaluation of public programmes: lessons from the Expanded Public Works Programmes in South Africa

Q3 Social Sciences
N. Matsiliza
{"title":"Economic evaluation of public programmes: lessons from the Expanded Public Works Programmes in South Africa","authors":"N. Matsiliza","doi":"10.21511/PMF.07(3).2018.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review aims at assessing the economic evaluation of public programmes such as the expanded public works programmes (EPWP) in South Africa. The South African government earmarked the EPWP for departments and municipalities to implement projects that are meaningful for economic transformation and inclusive growth. This study argues that economic evaluation of public programmes must consider the interplay of complex decisions making on resource allocations and take into account consequences thereafter in a systematic way. This review paper adopted a qualitative document analysis, where data is drawn from research reports on programme evaluation, policy documents, EPWP evaluation reports, books and articles drawn from accredited journals. Key findings from this study draw attention to unfulfilled great expectations to sustain job creation in an emerging economy in South Africa. Results also revealed that although the M&E design was suitable for the evaluation, it was not compared to any other alternative cost-effective measurement strategy to assess the economic value of the EPWP in South African public service. Based on the lessons from EPWP, this study recommends an integrative approach to evaluate job creation programmes in order to settle on the economic value of EPWP.","PeriodicalId":52837,"journal":{"name":"Public and Municipal Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public and Municipal Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/PMF.07(3).2018.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This review aims at assessing the economic evaluation of public programmes such as the expanded public works programmes (EPWP) in South Africa. The South African government earmarked the EPWP for departments and municipalities to implement projects that are meaningful for economic transformation and inclusive growth. This study argues that economic evaluation of public programmes must consider the interplay of complex decisions making on resource allocations and take into account consequences thereafter in a systematic way. This review paper adopted a qualitative document analysis, where data is drawn from research reports on programme evaluation, policy documents, EPWP evaluation reports, books and articles drawn from accredited journals. Key findings from this study draw attention to unfulfilled great expectations to sustain job creation in an emerging economy in South Africa. Results also revealed that although the M&E design was suitable for the evaluation, it was not compared to any other alternative cost-effective measurement strategy to assess the economic value of the EPWP in South African public service. Based on the lessons from EPWP, this study recommends an integrative approach to evaluate job creation programmes in order to settle on the economic value of EPWP.
公共方案的经济评价:来自南非扩大公共工程方案的教训
本审查的目的是评估诸如南非扩大公共工程方案等公共方案的经济评价。南非政府将EPWP指定给各部门和市政当局,以实施对经济转型和包容性增长有意义的项目。这项研究认为,公共方案的经济评价必须考虑到资源分配方面复杂决策的相互作用,并以系统的方式考虑到其后的后果。这篇综述论文采用了定性文件分析,其中的数据来自项目评估的研究报告、政策文件、EPWP评估报告、来自认可期刊的书籍和文章。本研究的主要发现引起了人们对南非这个新兴经济体未能实现的维持就业创造的巨大期望的关注。结果还显示,尽管M&E设计适合于评估,但没有将其与任何其他具有成本效益的替代测量策略进行比较,以评估南非公共服务EPWP的经济价值。基于EPWP的经验教训,本研究建议采用一种综合方法来评估就业创造计划,以确定EPWP的经济价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public and Municipal Finance
Public and Municipal Finance Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信