Regional differences in STEMI care in Spain. Data from the ACI-SEC Infarction Code Registry

Q2 Medicine
O. Rodriguez-Leor, A. B. Cid-Álvarez, Raúl Moreno, X. Rosselló, S. Ojeda, A. Serrador, R. López-Palop, J. Martín‐Moreiras, J. Ramón Rumoroso, Á. Cequier, Borja Ibanez, I. Cruz-González, R. Romaguera, Sergio Raposeiras and, Armando Pérez de Prado
{"title":"Regional differences in STEMI care in Spain. Data from the ACI-SEC Infarction Code Registry","authors":"O. Rodriguez-Leor, A. B. Cid-Álvarez, Raúl Moreno, X. Rosselló, S. Ojeda, A. Serrador, R. López-Palop, J. Martín‐Moreiras, J. Ramón Rumoroso, Á. Cequier, Borja Ibanez, I. Cruz-González, R. Romaguera, Sergio Raposeiras and, Armando Pérez de Prado","doi":"10.24875/recice.m22000360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". ABSTRACT Introduction and objectives: Geographical and organizational differences between different autonomous communities (AC) can generate differences in care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 17 heart attack code programs have been compared in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion therapy, delay to reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. Methods: National prospective observational study (83 centers included in 17 infarction networks). The recruitment period was 3 months (April 1 to June 30, 2019) with clinical follow-up at 30 days. Results: 4366 patients with STEMI were included. The incidence rate was variable between different AC ( P < .0001), as was gender ( P = .003) and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors ( P < .0001). Reperfusion treatment was primary angioplasty (range 77.5%-97.8%), fibrinolysis (range 0%-12.9%) or no treatment (range 2.2%- 13.5%). The analysis of the delay to reperfusion showed significant differences ( P < .001) for all the intervals analyzed. There were significant differences in 30-days mortality that disappeared after adjusting for clinical and healthcare network characteristics. Conclusions: Large differences in STEMI care have been detected between the different AC, in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion treatment, delay until reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. The differences in mortality disappeared after adjusting for the characteristics of the patient and the care network.","PeriodicalId":34613,"journal":{"name":"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/recice.m22000360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

. ABSTRACT Introduction and objectives: Geographical and organizational differences between different autonomous communities (AC) can generate differences in care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 17 heart attack code programs have been compared in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion therapy, delay to reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. Methods: National prospective observational study (83 centers included in 17 infarction networks). The recruitment period was 3 months (April 1 to June 30, 2019) with clinical follow-up at 30 days. Results: 4366 patients with STEMI were included. The incidence rate was variable between different AC ( P < .0001), as was gender ( P = .003) and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors ( P < .0001). Reperfusion treatment was primary angioplasty (range 77.5%-97.8%), fibrinolysis (range 0%-12.9%) or no treatment (range 2.2%- 13.5%). The analysis of the delay to reperfusion showed significant differences ( P < .001) for all the intervals analyzed. There were significant differences in 30-days mortality that disappeared after adjusting for clinical and healthcare network characteristics. Conclusions: Large differences in STEMI care have been detected between the different AC, in terms of incidence rate, clinical characteristics, reperfusion treatment, delay until reperfusion, and 30-day mortality. The differences in mortality disappeared after adjusting for the characteristics of the patient and the care network.
西班牙STEMI护理的地区差异。来自ACI-SEC梗塞代码注册表的数据
. 简介和目的:不同自治社区(AC)之间的地理和组织差异会导致st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的护理差异。在发病率、临床特征、再灌注治疗、再灌注延迟和30天死亡率方面,对17种心脏病发作编码方案进行了比较。方法:国家前瞻性观察研究(包括17个梗死网络的83个中心)。招募期为3个月(2019年4月1日至6月30日),临床随访30天。结果:纳入STEMI患者4366例。不同AC之间的发病率存在差异(P < 0.0001),性别(P = 0.003)和心血管危险因素的患病率(P < 0.0001)也存在差异。再灌注治疗包括初级血管成形术(77.5%-97.8%)、纤溶(0%-12.9%)或不治疗(2.2%- 13.5%)。再灌注延迟分析显示,各分析时间间隔差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。在调整临床和医疗网络特征后,30天死亡率存在显著差异。结论:不同AC在STEMI护理方面的发生率、临床特征、再灌注治疗、延迟再灌注和30天死亡率方面存在较大差异。在调整了患者的特点和护理网络后,死亡率的差异消失了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed
REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信