Gaps in Transmission: Reading Lacan’s Télévision

IF 0.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
MODERN PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1086/723143
P. Buse, R. Lapsley
{"title":"Gaps in Transmission: Reading Lacan’s Télévision","authors":"P. Buse, R. Lapsley","doi":"10.1086/723143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a close reading of Jacques Lacan’s Télévision (1974), which is both a text and a filmed artifact. It takes as its starting point Lacan’s claim that Télévision was a failure. It argues that Lacan called attention to this failure in order to reflect on it as a productive force in psychoanalysis, but also in his own performance, thus making Télévision a meditation on failure that enacts the thing that it anatomizes. The article traces the contours of this “failure,” paying close attention to the paradoxes and equivocations of the text and of the film. It considers Lacan’s failure in light of his own avowed clownishness in Télévision and relates this to his theoretical reflections on the comic in the text. To understand what a rupture Télévision constituted from televisual conventions of the time, the article then situates it in relation to the traditions of televised philosophy in France, a context that has been largely disregarded in accounts of Télévision. The final two sections then bring this together under the rubric of the failure in meaning. Noting that Lacan in the early 1970s was interested in what was not working out, most notably in what he called the rapport sexuel, it argues that these failures or gaps were not reasons for despair, but instead openings for invention and innovation, including of the creation of neologisms such as linguisterie and jouis-sens, and the reworking of concepts such as gay sçavoir, which we demonstrate at work in the enigmatic final words of Télévision.","PeriodicalId":45201,"journal":{"name":"MODERN PHILOLOGY","volume":"120 1","pages":"394 - 415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/723143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article offers a close reading of Jacques Lacan’s Télévision (1974), which is both a text and a filmed artifact. It takes as its starting point Lacan’s claim that Télévision was a failure. It argues that Lacan called attention to this failure in order to reflect on it as a productive force in psychoanalysis, but also in his own performance, thus making Télévision a meditation on failure that enacts the thing that it anatomizes. The article traces the contours of this “failure,” paying close attention to the paradoxes and equivocations of the text and of the film. It considers Lacan’s failure in light of his own avowed clownishness in Télévision and relates this to his theoretical reflections on the comic in the text. To understand what a rupture Télévision constituted from televisual conventions of the time, the article then situates it in relation to the traditions of televised philosophy in France, a context that has been largely disregarded in accounts of Télévision. The final two sections then bring this together under the rubric of the failure in meaning. Noting that Lacan in the early 1970s was interested in what was not working out, most notably in what he called the rapport sexuel, it argues that these failures or gaps were not reasons for despair, but instead openings for invention and innovation, including of the creation of neologisms such as linguisterie and jouis-sens, and the reworking of concepts such as gay sçavoir, which we demonstrate at work in the enigmatic final words of Télévision.
传播中的差距:解读拉康的Télévision
这篇文章细读了雅克·拉康的《Télévision》(1974),它既是一部文本,也是一部电影。它以拉康声称Télévision失败为出发点。它认为,拉康呼吁人们关注这种失败,是为了将其作为精神分析中的生产力进行反思,也是为了在他自己的表演中进行反思,从而使Télévision成为对失败的沉思,再现了它所解剖的东西。文章追溯了这种“失败”的轮廓,密切关注文本和电影的悖论和模棱两可。它根据拉康自己在Télévision中公开宣称的小丑形象来看待他的失败,并将其与他对文本中漫画的理论思考联系起来。为了理解Télévision从当时的电视惯例中构成了什么样的断裂,文章将其与法国电视哲学的传统联系起来,而在Télèvision的报道中,这一背景在很大程度上被忽视了。最后两节将这一点放在意义失败的标题下。注意到拉康在20世纪70年代初对没有成功的事情感兴趣,尤其是他所说的“性关系”,它认为这些失败或差距不是绝望的原因,而是发明和创新的机会,包括创造语言学和jouis sens等新词,以及重新设计gay sçavoir等概念,我们在Télévision神秘的最后一句话中展示了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MODERN PHILOLOGY
MODERN PHILOLOGY Multiple-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Founded in 1903, Modern Philology sets the standard for literary scholarship, history, and criticism. In addition to innovative and scholarly articles (in English) on literature in all modern world languages, MP also publishes insightful book reviews of recent books as well as review articles and research on archival documents. Editor Richard Strier is happy to announce that we now welcome contributions on literature in non-European languages and contributions that productively compare texts or traditions from European and non-European literatures. In general, we expect contributions to be written in (or translated into) English, and we expect quotations from non-English languages to be translated into English as well as reproduced in the original.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信