The value-added creation effect of industry position in global value chains: implications for Asia-Pacific economies

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Soonchan Park, Innwon Park
{"title":"The value-added creation effect of industry position in global value chains: implications for Asia-Pacific economies","authors":"Soonchan Park,&nbsp;Innwon Park","doi":"10.1111/apel.12329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We analyse the value-added creation effect of global value chain (GVC) participation activities of APEC member economies, using a fixed-effects regression model analysis based on country–industry data from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Inter-country Input–Output Tables. We find that forward participation in GVCs is more desirable than backward participation for creating domestic value-added and that the industry position in the middle stages of the production line creates higher domestic value-added per output unit. These results hold regardless of the application of standard Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) or fractional logit for panel data and of the characteristics of the interconnected countries in GVCs (APEC member vs. non-APEC member economies, Asian APEC vs. non-Asian APEC members, developed vs. developing countries). This implies that the conventional firm- or product-specific U-shaped ‘smile curve hypothesis’ is not applicable at the economy-wide, country–industry level. This finding suggests that depending on the product type, manufacturing industries can be a major driving force for less-developed APEC member economies to climb the development ladder. Since GVC participation gains are diversified across industries and upgrading country–industry positions in GVCs are challenging for APEC member economies, we strongly recommend that they construct effective domestic value chains and coordinate with other members while upgrading their GVC participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44776,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Pacific Economic Literature","volume":"35 2","pages":"95-122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/apel.12329","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Pacific Economic Literature","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apel.12329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

We analyse the value-added creation effect of global value chain (GVC) participation activities of APEC member economies, using a fixed-effects regression model analysis based on country–industry data from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Inter-country Input–Output Tables. We find that forward participation in GVCs is more desirable than backward participation for creating domestic value-added and that the industry position in the middle stages of the production line creates higher domestic value-added per output unit. These results hold regardless of the application of standard Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) or fractional logit for panel data and of the characteristics of the interconnected countries in GVCs (APEC member vs. non-APEC member economies, Asian APEC vs. non-Asian APEC members, developed vs. developing countries). This implies that the conventional firm- or product-specific U-shaped ‘smile curve hypothesis’ is not applicable at the economy-wide, country–industry level. This finding suggests that depending on the product type, manufacturing industries can be a major driving force for less-developed APEC member economies to climb the development ladder. Since GVC participation gains are diversified across industries and upgrading country–industry positions in GVCs are challenging for APEC member economies, we strongly recommend that they construct effective domestic value chains and coordinate with other members while upgrading their GVC participation.

全球价值链中产业地位的增值创造效应:对亚太经济体的启示
基于经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家间投入产出表的国家-产业数据,我们采用固定效应回归模型分析了APEC成员经济体参与全球价值链(GVC)活动的增值创造效应。我们发现,在创造国内增加值方面,前向参与比后向参与更可取,处于生产线中间阶段的产业位置创造了更高的单位产出国内增加值。无论对面板数据采用标准的普通最小二乘(OLS)或分数对数,也无论全球价值链中相互关联的国家(APEC成员与非APEC成员经济体、亚洲APEC与非亚洲APEC成员、发达国家与发展中国家)的特征如何,这些结果都是成立的。这意味着传统的公司或产品特定的u形“微笑曲线假设”不适用于整个经济,国家-行业层面。这一发现表明,根据不同的产品类型,制造业可以成为APEC欠发达成员经济体攀登发展阶梯的主要动力。亚太经合组织各成员产业参与全球价值链的收益存在差异,提升本国产业在全球价值链中的地位面临挑战,我们强烈建议各成员构建有效的国内价值链,并与其他成员协调,提升全球价值链参与水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Asian-Pacific Economic Literature (APEL) is an essential resource for anyone interested in economic development in the Asian-Pacific region. With original articles on topical policy issues, literature surveys, and abstracts of articles from over 300 journals, APEL makes it easy for you to keep ahead of the proliferating research on this dynamic and increasingly important region. Read by politicians, journalists, businesspeople, policy-makers, industrialists and academics, APEL avoids technical jargon, and is the only journal devoted to one-stop, in-depth reporting of research on the development of Asian-Pacific economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信