Comparison of Effects of Volume-Controlled and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation during Laparoscopic Surgeries in Birat Medical College Teaching Hospital
Batsalya Arjyal, Kanak Khanal, L. Rajbanshi, A. Bajracharya, Gunjan Regmi
{"title":"Comparison of Effects of Volume-Controlled and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation during Laparoscopic Surgeries in Birat Medical College Teaching Hospital","authors":"Batsalya Arjyal, Kanak Khanal, L. Rajbanshi, A. Bajracharya, Gunjan Regmi","doi":"10.3126/bjhs.v7i3.52756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The pneumoperitoneum created during laparoscopic surgery has numerous effects on the patient ranging from respiratory to hemodynamics. The two common methods of ventilator are volume control and pressure control. The volume control method has been commonly used during general anesthesia. Pressure control method has been used in intensive care unit for improving the respiratory mechanics. \nObjective: The study aims to compare the effects of pressure control to volume control ventilation in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The hypothesis of the study is that pressure control method improves the respiratory mechanics by decreasing the peak airway pressure and increasing the lung compliance. \n Methodology: The total of 100 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were undertaken for this study. The 50 in each group (PCV and VCV) were allotted randomly. As per predicted body weight, the tidal volume was adjusted to 8 ml/kg, for both the modes of ventilation, peep 5 mm of Hg with fio2 of 100% and I:E-1:2,. The variations in peak airway pressure, mean airway pressure, lung compliance, SPO2 and hemodynamic parameters were observed at baseline (T1), at pneumoperitoneum (T2), after 10 minutes of pneumoperitonium (T3) and at 20 minutes after pneumoperitonium (T4). \nResults: The pressure control group on comparison to volume control mode group showed significant decrease in peak airway pressure while increase in mean airway pressure and increase in lung compliance at different points of pneumoperitoneum. However there was no significant change in hemodynamics between the two groups in patient undergoing laparoscopic surgery. \nConclusion: We conclude that respiratory mechanics improve when the patient is on pressure control ventilation in compared to volume control method of ventilation. Whereas there is no difference in hemodynamic parameters between the two methods. \n ","PeriodicalId":31640,"journal":{"name":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/bjhs.v7i3.52756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The pneumoperitoneum created during laparoscopic surgery has numerous effects on the patient ranging from respiratory to hemodynamics. The two common methods of ventilator are volume control and pressure control. The volume control method has been commonly used during general anesthesia. Pressure control method has been used in intensive care unit for improving the respiratory mechanics.
Objective: The study aims to compare the effects of pressure control to volume control ventilation in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The hypothesis of the study is that pressure control method improves the respiratory mechanics by decreasing the peak airway pressure and increasing the lung compliance.
Methodology: The total of 100 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were undertaken for this study. The 50 in each group (PCV and VCV) were allotted randomly. As per predicted body weight, the tidal volume was adjusted to 8 ml/kg, for both the modes of ventilation, peep 5 mm of Hg with fio2 of 100% and I:E-1:2,. The variations in peak airway pressure, mean airway pressure, lung compliance, SPO2 and hemodynamic parameters were observed at baseline (T1), at pneumoperitoneum (T2), after 10 minutes of pneumoperitonium (T3) and at 20 minutes after pneumoperitonium (T4).
Results: The pressure control group on comparison to volume control mode group showed significant decrease in peak airway pressure while increase in mean airway pressure and increase in lung compliance at different points of pneumoperitoneum. However there was no significant change in hemodynamics between the two groups in patient undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
Conclusion: We conclude that respiratory mechanics improve when the patient is on pressure control ventilation in compared to volume control method of ventilation. Whereas there is no difference in hemodynamic parameters between the two methods.
引言:腹腔镜手术中产生的气腹对患者有很多影响,从呼吸到血流动力学。呼吸机的两种常用方法是音量控制和压力控制。在全身麻醉期间,通常使用容量控制方法。压力控制方法已被用于重症监护室,以改善呼吸力学。目的:比较腹腔镜手术患者压力控制和容量控制通气的效果。该研究的假设是,压力控制方法通过降低气道峰值压力和增加肺顺应性来改善呼吸力学。方法:本研究共有100名患者接受了腹腔镜手术。每组50人(PCV和VCV)随机分配。根据预测的体重,潮气量调整为8ml/kg,对于两种通气模式,在fio2为100%和I:E-1:2的情况下,窥视5 mm Hg,。在基线(T1)、气腹(T2)、气腹膜后10分钟(T3)和气腹膜后20分钟(T4)观察峰值气道压力、平均气道压力、肺顺应性、SPO2和血液动力学参数的变化。结果:与容量控制模式组相比,压力控制组在不同气腹点的峰值气道压力显著降低,而平均气道压力升高,肺顺应性增加。然而,在接受腹腔镜手术的患者中,两组患者的血液动力学没有显著变化。结论:与容量控制通气方法相比,压力控制通气可改善患者的呼吸力学。而两种方法在血液动力学参数上没有差异。