New Method to Assess Sagittal Jaw Position: TWM and TWG Angles: A Cephalometric Study

Anita Bishnoi, N. Kamat
{"title":"New Method to Assess Sagittal Jaw Position: TWM and TWG Angles: A Cephalometric Study","authors":"Anita Bishnoi, N. Kamat","doi":"10.1177/03015742231188207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to develop new cephalometric angles TWM (T-Tuberculum sella, W-wing point, M-maxillary point) and TWG (T-Tuberculum sella, W-wing point, G point-center of mandibular symphysis) and to assess and evaluate the newly developed angles in determining the maxillary and mandibular sagittal position, respectively. Ninety pretreatment lateral cephalograms from the records of Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics were traced and divided equally into three groups as class I, class II, and class III based on cephalometric values of ANB angle and WITS appraisal. Further for each radiograph, angles such as SNA, TWM, SNB, and TWG were measured and recorded. The TWM angle (Maxilla) was formed using the points T-Tuberculum sella, W-wing point, M-maxillary point, and the TWG angle (mandible) was formed using the points T-Tuberculum sella, W-wing point, G point-center of mandibular symphysis. The mean values of TWM and TWG angles for the class I group were 120.1°± 3.6° and 101.4 ± 3.7°, respectively. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used followed by Tukey post hoc testing to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between the mean values of the three groups. A p value ≤ .05 was considered to be statistically significant. Pearson correlation test revealed a strong correlation between SNA and TWM angles and similarly between SNB and TWG angles. The two new angles, TWM for maxilla and TWG for mandible established, can be used as an alternative for assessing the sagittal position of the jaw bases and will give a clearer picture, as stable and reproducible landmarks are used.","PeriodicalId":31847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742231188207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to develop new cephalometric angles TWM (T-Tuberculum sella, W-wing point, M-maxillary point) and TWG (T-Tuberculum sella, W-wing point, G point-center of mandibular symphysis) and to assess and evaluate the newly developed angles in determining the maxillary and mandibular sagittal position, respectively. Ninety pretreatment lateral cephalograms from the records of Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics were traced and divided equally into three groups as class I, class II, and class III based on cephalometric values of ANB angle and WITS appraisal. Further for each radiograph, angles such as SNA, TWM, SNB, and TWG were measured and recorded. The TWM angle (Maxilla) was formed using the points T-Tuberculum sella, W-wing point, M-maxillary point, and the TWG angle (mandible) was formed using the points T-Tuberculum sella, W-wing point, G point-center of mandibular symphysis. The mean values of TWM and TWG angles for the class I group were 120.1°± 3.6° and 101.4 ± 3.7°, respectively. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used followed by Tukey post hoc testing to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between the mean values of the three groups. A p value ≤ .05 was considered to be statistically significant. Pearson correlation test revealed a strong correlation between SNA and TWM angles and similarly between SNB and TWG angles. The two new angles, TWM for maxilla and TWG for mandible established, can be used as an alternative for assessing the sagittal position of the jaw bases and will give a clearer picture, as stable and reproducible landmarks are used.
评估矢状颚位置的新方法:TWM和TWG角度:头位测量研究
本研究的目的是建立新的头位测量角度TWM (t-鞍结节,w翼点,m -上颌点)和TWG (t-鞍结节,w翼点,下颌联合中心G点),并评估和评价新发展的角度分别确定上颌和下颌矢状位。对正畸牙面矫形科记录的90张预处理侧位头颅片进行追踪,根据ANB角和WITS评估的头侧测量值,将其平均分为I类、II类、III类3组。此外,对于每张x线片,测量并记录SNA、TWM、SNB和TWG等角度。以鞍t结核点、w翼点、m上颌点形成TWM角(上颌骨),以鞍t结核点、w翼点、下颌联合中心G点形成TWG角(下颌骨)。第一类组TWM和TWG角度平均值分别为120.1°±3.6°和101.4±3.7°。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA),然后进行Tukey事后检验,确定三组平均值之间是否存在统计学差异。p值≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。Pearson相关检验显示,SNA与TWM角度之间存在很强的相关性,SNB与TWG角度之间也存在类似的相关性。这两个新的角度,即上颌的TWM和下颌骨的TWG,可以作为评估下颌基部矢状位置的替代方法,并将提供更清晰的图像,因为使用了稳定和可重复的地标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信