Incidence of Esophageal Thermal Injury Using a Safety Protocol During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

A. Borges, G. Gazzoni, J. Yáñez, K. Andrade, Celine de Oliveira Boff, F. V. Ferreira, E. Bartholomay, Á. Rösler, F. Lucchese, C. Kalil
{"title":"Incidence of Esophageal Thermal Injury Using a Safety Protocol During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation","authors":"A. Borges, G. Gazzoni, J. Yáñez, K. Andrade, Celine de Oliveira Boff, F. V. Ferreira, E. Bartholomay, Á. Rösler, F. Lucchese, C. Kalil","doi":"10.24207/jca.v33i4.3413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Catheter ablation has been a common procedure used for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrioesophagel fistula (AEF) is one of the most feared complications of AF ablation. Although it is a rare complication, severe esophageal thermal injury must be avoided. It is important to describe a safe method of preventing esophageal injuries without increasing AF recurrence. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency AF catheter ablation during 1 year-period wa conducted. One hundred and four patients were enrolled divided in two groups: one with a maximum recorded esophageal temperature (ET) < 38 °C and other with a maximum recorded ET ≥ 38 °C. The primary endpoint was detection of endoscopic esophageal lesions after AF ablation and the secondary endpoint was AF recurrence according to the maximum ET reached during the procedure. Results: The maximum ET was on average 37.3 ± 1.0 °C. Only 4 (3.8%) patients had esophageal lesion diagnosed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. There were no cases of esophageal perforation. The AF recurrence rate was 9.6% during the follow-up (10 patients, 3 from the ET max < 38 °C group and 7 from the ET max ≥ 38 °C group; p = 0.181). The maximum ET was not associated with AF recurrence after catheter ablation (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 0.84-3.24, p = 0.14). Conclusions: A low incidence of esophageal injury after AF ablation with the use of a specific esophageal protection protocol was found. There was no esophageal perforation. The AF recurrence rate was similar to that described in the literature.","PeriodicalId":33934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24207/jca.v33i4.3413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Catheter ablation has been a common procedure used for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrioesophagel fistula (AEF) is one of the most feared complications of AF ablation. Although it is a rare complication, severe esophageal thermal injury must be avoided. It is important to describe a safe method of preventing esophageal injuries without increasing AF recurrence. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency AF catheter ablation during 1 year-period wa conducted. One hundred and four patients were enrolled divided in two groups: one with a maximum recorded esophageal temperature (ET) < 38 °C and other with a maximum recorded ET ≥ 38 °C. The primary endpoint was detection of endoscopic esophageal lesions after AF ablation and the secondary endpoint was AF recurrence according to the maximum ET reached during the procedure. Results: The maximum ET was on average 37.3 ± 1.0 °C. Only 4 (3.8%) patients had esophageal lesion diagnosed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. There were no cases of esophageal perforation. The AF recurrence rate was 9.6% during the follow-up (10 patients, 3 from the ET max < 38 °C group and 7 from the ET max ≥ 38 °C group; p = 0.181). The maximum ET was not associated with AF recurrence after catheter ablation (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 0.84-3.24, p = 0.14). Conclusions: A low incidence of esophageal injury after AF ablation with the use of a specific esophageal protection protocol was found. There was no esophageal perforation. The AF recurrence rate was similar to that described in the literature.
心房颤动消融过程中使用安全方案的食管热损伤发生率
目的:导管消融术是治疗心房颤动(AF)的常用方法。心房食道瘘(AEF)是房颤消融最令人担忧的并发症之一。尽管这是一种罕见的并发症,但必须避免严重的食道热损伤。描述一种在不增加房颤复发的情况下预防食管损伤的安全方法是很重要的。方法:对1年内连续接受射频房颤导管消融术的患者进行回顾性队列研究。104名患者被分为两组:一组记录的最高食管温度(ET)<38°C,另一组记录记录的最高ET≥38°C。主要终点是AF消融后内窥镜食管病变的检测,次要终点是根据手术过程中达到的最大ET的AF复发。结果:最大ET平均为37.3±1.0°C。只有4例(3.8%)患者通过上消化道内窥镜检查诊断为食管病变。无食管穿孔病例。随访期间房颤复发率为9.6%(10名患者,其中3名来自ET max<38°C组,7名来自ET max=38°C组;p=0.181)。导管消融后最大ET与房颤复发无关(OR=1.65,95%CI=0.84-3.24,p=0.14)已找到。没有食道穿孔。房颤复发率与文献中描述的相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信