Public control and supervision in the economy: theoretical and legal justification

S. Agamagomedova
{"title":"Public control and supervision in the economy: theoretical and legal justification","authors":"S. Agamagomedova","doi":"10.22363/2313-2337-2023-27-2-421-438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of the rapid processes of economy digitalization and integration, the issues of updating the forms and methods of public law impact on economic relations in the new modern conditions naturally arise. Taking into account the fact that control and supervision are traditionally positioned as basic management functions, the issues of substantiating public control and supervision in various areas of managerial influence in general and in the economic sphere in particular are becoming increasingly relevant. At the same time, the literature review allows to speak about the lack of common positions on the issues of structural and functional content of the category “public control and supervision in the economy”. In this regard, the purpose of the study is determined as the need for a theoretical and legal substantiation of the concept of public control and supervision in the economy, its structural and functional content and place in the general system of public administration. The materials for the study are the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists in the field of public control and supervision, their individual areas (public financial control, public environmental control, etc.). Various opinions on the structural and functional content of public control and supervision in the economy, its individual areas, assessment of the subject composition, goals and mechanisms for implementing such activities have formed the basis for classifying the existing scientific approaches to justification of public control and supervision in the economy. It is proposed to distinguish at least three approaches to such justification: from narrow (public control and supervision as control and supervision of public authorities) to two options for a broader approach (at the national and supranational levels). The latter seems relevant from the point of view of unification of states on economic basis and formation of regional markets for goods and services in the modern economic space.","PeriodicalId":32648,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2023-27-2-421-438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of the rapid processes of economy digitalization and integration, the issues of updating the forms and methods of public law impact on economic relations in the new modern conditions naturally arise. Taking into account the fact that control and supervision are traditionally positioned as basic management functions, the issues of substantiating public control and supervision in various areas of managerial influence in general and in the economic sphere in particular are becoming increasingly relevant. At the same time, the literature review allows to speak about the lack of common positions on the issues of structural and functional content of the category “public control and supervision in the economy”. In this regard, the purpose of the study is determined as the need for a theoretical and legal substantiation of the concept of public control and supervision in the economy, its structural and functional content and place in the general system of public administration. The materials for the study are the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists in the field of public control and supervision, their individual areas (public financial control, public environmental control, etc.). Various opinions on the structural and functional content of public control and supervision in the economy, its individual areas, assessment of the subject composition, goals and mechanisms for implementing such activities have formed the basis for classifying the existing scientific approaches to justification of public control and supervision in the economy. It is proposed to distinguish at least three approaches to such justification: from narrow (public control and supervision as control and supervision of public authorities) to two options for a broader approach (at the national and supranational levels). The latter seems relevant from the point of view of unification of states on economic basis and formation of regional markets for goods and services in the modern economic space.
经济中的公共控制与监督:理论与法律的正当性
在经济数字化和一体化的快速进程中,在新的现代条件下,公法形式和方法的更新对经济关系的影响问题自然而然地出现了。考虑到控制和监督传统上被定位为基本管理职能,在具有管理影响力的各个领域,特别是在经济领域,加强公共控制和监督的问题变得越来越重要。同时,文献综述允许谈论在“经济中的公共控制和监督”类别的结构和功能内容问题上缺乏共同立场。在这方面,本研究的目的被确定为需要从理论和法律上证实经济中的公共控制和监督概念、其结构和功能内容以及在一般公共行政系统中的地位。研究材料是国内外科学家在公共控制和监督领域及其各自领域(公共财政控制、公共环境控制等)的科学著作,实施这些活动的目标和机制构成了对现有科学方法进行分类的基础,这些方法可以证明公共控制和监督在经济中的合理性。建议至少区分三种方法来证明这一点:从狭义的(公共控制和监督,即对公共当局的控制和监督)到更广泛的方法的两种选择(在国家和超国家层面)。从国家在经济基础上的统一以及在现代经济空间中形成商品和服务的区域市场的角度来看,后者似乎是相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信