Life Cycle Assessment of Shared Municipal Solid Waste Management Facilities in a Metropolitan Region

Q4 Environmental Science
D. A. Colvero, J. Ramalho, Ana Paula Duarte Gomes, L. Tarelho, Manuel Arlindo Amador de Matos
{"title":"Life Cycle Assessment of Shared Municipal Solid Waste Management Facilities in a Metropolitan Region","authors":"D. A. Colvero, J. Ramalho, Ana Paula Duarte Gomes, L. Tarelho, Manuel Arlindo Amador de Matos","doi":"10.5276/jswtm/2022.329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Brazil, there are densely populated metropolitan regions, motivated by a great migratory flux in the 1970s. One of the consequences is the increased per capita municipal solid waste generation, which has been constantly associated with deficient waste management. That is the\n case of 19 municipalities from Goiás State that inappropriately disposed of 73% of the produced household waste. According to Law No. 12,305/2010, these municipalities must implement a waste management facility with MSW recovery and landfill diversions to minimize environmental impacts.\n Furthermore, a specific life cycle assessment tool was used to conduct an environmental assessment of different alternatives for a shared waste management system among the metropolitan municipalities. The results have shown that the current scenario has the largest environmental impacts in\n seven of 12 assessed impact categories, among them the global warming potential. In this scenario, final waste disposal has the greatest environmental impact, particularly due to unlicensed landfills. Conversely, anaerobic digestion with greater landfill diversions generates the lowest emissions\n in eight of 12 impact categories. This demonstrates the importance of anaerobic digestion and the compliance of the diversion targets established by the Brazilian National Plan for Solid Waste Management.","PeriodicalId":35783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5276/jswtm/2022.329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Brazil, there are densely populated metropolitan regions, motivated by a great migratory flux in the 1970s. One of the consequences is the increased per capita municipal solid waste generation, which has been constantly associated with deficient waste management. That is the case of 19 municipalities from Goiás State that inappropriately disposed of 73% of the produced household waste. According to Law No. 12,305/2010, these municipalities must implement a waste management facility with MSW recovery and landfill diversions to minimize environmental impacts. Furthermore, a specific life cycle assessment tool was used to conduct an environmental assessment of different alternatives for a shared waste management system among the metropolitan municipalities. The results have shown that the current scenario has the largest environmental impacts in seven of 12 assessed impact categories, among them the global warming potential. In this scenario, final waste disposal has the greatest environmental impact, particularly due to unlicensed landfills. Conversely, anaerobic digestion with greater landfill diversions generates the lowest emissions in eight of 12 impact categories. This demonstrates the importance of anaerobic digestion and the compliance of the diversion targets established by the Brazilian National Plan for Solid Waste Management.
大都市地区共享城市固体废物管理设施的生命周期评估
在巴西,受20世纪70年代大规模移民流动的推动,有人口稠密的大都市地区。其后果之一是人均城市固体废物产生量的增加,这一直与废物管理不足有关。戈亚斯州的19个市镇就是这样,它们不恰当地处理了73%的产生的家庭垃圾。根据第12305/2010号法律,这些市政当局必须实施垃圾管理设施,包括MSW回收和垃圾填埋转移,以最大限度地减少对环境的影响。此外,还使用了一种特定的生命周期评估工具,对大都市之间共享废物管理系统的不同替代方案进行了环境评估。结果表明,在12个评估影响类别中的7个类别中,当前情景对环境的影响最大,其中包括全球变暖潜力。在这种情况下,最终的废物处理对环境的影响最大,特别是由于未经许可的垃圾填埋场。相反,在12个影响类别中的8个类别中,具有更大垃圾填埋转移的厌氧消化产生的排放量最低。这表明厌氧消化的重要性以及遵守巴西固体废物管理国家计划制定的转移目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management
Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management Environmental Science-Waste Management and Disposal
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management is an international peer-reviewed journal covering landfill, recycling, waste-to-energy, waste reduction, policy and economics, composting, waste collection and transfer, municipal waste, industrial waste, residual waste and other waste management and technology subjects. The Journal is published quarterly (February, May, August, November) by the Widener University School of Engineering. It is supported by a distinguished international editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信