Genres, media, and recontextualization practices

IF 1.1 Q3 COMMUNICATION
H. Gruber
{"title":"Genres, media, and recontextualization practices","authors":"H. Gruber","doi":"10.1075/IP.00023.GRU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The main argument put forward in this paper is that traditional linguistic genre theories neglect the importance\n of media and their modal affordances in the formation of new genres. It argues that media cannot be viewed as (passive)\n configurations of technical, semiotic, and cultural features which are chosen by actors/ rhetors in order to serve their\n communicative needs, but rather as mediators whose modal affordances actively influence communicators’ meaning making choices. In\n order to support this argument, it will be shown how forms of discourse representation gradually developed from a stylistic device\n in oral communication to a genre constitutive practice (e.g., in printed academic communication), and eventually became a genre of\n its own (as the practice of “sharing” content) in social media communication. In the analyses, the focus is on the interplay\n between modal affordances of the different media in which discourse representation formats are used, their formal properties, and\n pragmatic factors (like audience expectations in different communicative genres and situations). It is shown how innovative\n aspects of a medium influence formal features of discourse representation which in turn serve different communicative purposes in\n different genres.","PeriodicalId":36241,"journal":{"name":"Internet Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/IP.00023.GRU","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The main argument put forward in this paper is that traditional linguistic genre theories neglect the importance of media and their modal affordances in the formation of new genres. It argues that media cannot be viewed as (passive) configurations of technical, semiotic, and cultural features which are chosen by actors/ rhetors in order to serve their communicative needs, but rather as mediators whose modal affordances actively influence communicators’ meaning making choices. In order to support this argument, it will be shown how forms of discourse representation gradually developed from a stylistic device in oral communication to a genre constitutive practice (e.g., in printed academic communication), and eventually became a genre of its own (as the practice of “sharing” content) in social media communication. In the analyses, the focus is on the interplay between modal affordances of the different media in which discourse representation formats are used, their formal properties, and pragmatic factors (like audience expectations in different communicative genres and situations). It is shown how innovative aspects of a medium influence formal features of discourse representation which in turn serve different communicative purposes in different genres.
类型、媒体和再情境化实践
本文提出的主要论点是,传统的语言体裁理论忽视了媒介及其模态可供性在新体裁形成中的重要性。它认为,媒介不能被视为行动者/修辞者为了满足其交际需求而选择的技术、符号和文化特征的(被动)配置,而应该被视为其模态可供性积极影响交际者意义选择的中介。为了支持这一论点,我们将展示话语表征形式是如何从口头交流中的一种文体手段逐渐发展为一种体裁构成实践(例如,在印刷学术交流中),并最终在社交媒体交流中成为一种自己的体裁(作为“共享”内容的实践)。在分析中,重点是使用话语表征形式的不同媒介的模态可供性、其形式属性和语用因素(如不同交际类型和情境下的受众期望)之间的相互作用。它展示了媒介的创新方面如何影响话语表征的形式特征,而这些形式特征又在不同的体裁中为不同的交际目的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internet Pragmatics
Internet Pragmatics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信