{"title":"Evaluation and prediction of therapeutic response to neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer by diffusion weighted imaging","authors":"Y. Mi, Jing Wu, Q. Shen, Wei Yu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)for prostate cancer on diffusion weighted imaging base on the pathological results after radical prostatectomy. \n \n \nMethods \nMedical records of 33 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and radical prostatectomy between January 2016 and September 2019 at Peking University First Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Average age of patients was 67.7 (49-81) years old. All of the patients underwent prostate MRI examination before and after neoadjuvant ADT. \n \n \nResults \nMean prostate volume after neoadjuvant ADT is 28.5 (6.25-113.76) cm3, which decreased significantly by therapy (Z=-4.458, P<0.05). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values increased significantly in tumor (1.070±0.325) vs. (0.828±0.291)×10-3mm2/s (P<0.001) and decreased in benign prostatic tissue (P<0.05). Relative changes in ADC differed significantly between low-median level ISUP group and high level ISUP group (0.315±0.173) vs. (0.164±0.224)×10-3mm2/s (P<0.05), as well as obvious reaction group and focal reaction group(0.278±0.21) vs. (0.094±0.119)×10-3mm2/s (P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nThere were significant, quantitative measurable changes of ADC value in prostate cancer after neoadjuvant ADT. DWI can be used to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant ADT for prostate cancer as well as predicting pathological features. \n \n \nKey words: \nProstatic neoplasms; Prostate cancer; Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy; Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI); Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)","PeriodicalId":10343,"journal":{"name":"中华泌尿外科杂志","volume":"41 1","pages":"120-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华泌尿外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.02.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)for prostate cancer on diffusion weighted imaging base on the pathological results after radical prostatectomy.
Methods
Medical records of 33 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and radical prostatectomy between January 2016 and September 2019 at Peking University First Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Average age of patients was 67.7 (49-81) years old. All of the patients underwent prostate MRI examination before and after neoadjuvant ADT.
Results
Mean prostate volume after neoadjuvant ADT is 28.5 (6.25-113.76) cm3, which decreased significantly by therapy (Z=-4.458, P<0.05). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values increased significantly in tumor (1.070±0.325) vs. (0.828±0.291)×10-3mm2/s (P<0.001) and decreased in benign prostatic tissue (P<0.05). Relative changes in ADC differed significantly between low-median level ISUP group and high level ISUP group (0.315±0.173) vs. (0.164±0.224)×10-3mm2/s (P<0.05), as well as obvious reaction group and focal reaction group(0.278±0.21) vs. (0.094±0.119)×10-3mm2/s (P<0.05).
Conclusions
There were significant, quantitative measurable changes of ADC value in prostate cancer after neoadjuvant ADT. DWI can be used to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant ADT for prostate cancer as well as predicting pathological features.
Key words:
Prostatic neoplasms; Prostate cancer; Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy; Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI); Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Urology (monthly) was founded in 1980. It is a publicly issued academic journal supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and comments in this field. This journal mainly reports on the latest scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the professional field of urology at home and abroad, as well as basic theoretical research results closely related to clinical practice.
The journal has columns such as treatises, abstracts of treatises, experimental studies, case reports, experience exchanges, reviews, reviews, lectures, etc.
Chinese Journal of Urology has been included in well-known databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Chinese Science Citation Database Source Journal (including extended version), and also included in American Chemical Abstracts (CA). The journal has been rated as a quality journal by the Association for Science and Technology and as an excellent journal by the Chinese Medical Association.